Nothing pretty about a humpback!
I think my LCRx looks way nicer!
Yeah, if you want to be a pretty boy, you can have the 642, but if you want to be a bada$$, you have to have the LCR. (just messing with you CajunBass
I tried to bring myself to buy a Ruger LCR. I really did. I looked at it. I handled it. I tried the trigger. I really wanted to like it.
The LCR does have a sweet trigger. And it is easily available in 9MM if you want one, unlike the S&W j frames. It is light and is easily carried.
But it is hideous. Looks too "space age-ey". Polymer doesn't belong on a recolver. And it's really no lighter than a 442 or 642.
I'd get a 442. Same as 642 but better finish. Available without the lock, of course.
Haha! Touché. There you go then. I'm not on that level yet.Why son. When you're as BadBass as I am, You don't need to carry an ugly gun to prove it.
In the end, like all Ruger revolvers, since the "six" series, it was just to blinking ugly to buy. It might be good, but it's ugly. And that matters to me. I look at my guns a lot more than I do anything else with them.