Case head and bolt face ?

Hang on, here is: Sierra, Second Edition under authors. that section comes before they start numbering the pages. Of all the accomplishments he is given credit for and recognized as one of the great shooters the only thing you could come up with is the tur#d in the fiddle case and punch bowl, and we both know where you got that information from.

F. Guffey
 
F.Guffey, back to your full circle post. I shoot Benchrest with the same rifle at the same range. All the people I shoot with share information & would answer any question. Guess I shoot with a great group of shooters. This got off the thread's question
 
Guess I shoot with a great group of shooters.

CW308, yes you do. I spend more time helping other shooters than I spend shooting. That day I ask for an isolated bench long enough to test fire 3 rifles. The next shooter to take a bench took the bench next to me. He started to explain to me how much he knew about what I was doing. Dottie warned him.

F. Guffey
 
It's better to listen sometimes and keep the truth to yourself than to turn blue in the face with frustration from someone who thinks that they can pxss farther than you I think we are all here to learn the true fundamentals and possibly take the top 50 people and there equipment from the last 4 years of either F-class , Bench rest or which ever disapline you choose to gather your true and solid facts from and possibly share what truly has been working for the championship winner's !!! I don't believe we should be spending our time telling people what we think is the winning combo without tangible evidence all we want to do is learn and having been a apprentice I've studied theory of truth in books and tricks of the trade in the field !!!!! U just think we out to keep it real if 60% of last year's F class winners used 6 mm but Mr moncho still thinks that a huge chunk of 338 lapua magnum is the only way because he's been doing it for 20 years that way who's right ??? Yep you guessed it !!!!!
 
What constitutes "tangible evidence" on internet forums?

Everyone uses a different set of objectives, conditions and standards when evaluating everything they do deciding what's best for them. It's sometimes called the "rubber ruler syndrome." Everyone measures stuff differently; depending on how they hold the "ruler" against a given situation, it won't measure the same for everyone.
 
Like I just said if you want to be good do what the best have done fore the last 4 years try 50 a year 200 people then go on average of what the have done and won then do that and don't do what the lasers did and call it a learning curve 60 % of last year's F class winners used 6 mm rifles it must be a good file for me to build next instead of running around like a chicken with my head cut of wondering what to do same with actions and scopes and barrel and stocks etc...font get me wrong or mixed up with someone else I want to be a extreme long range shooter that's all I'm not interested in 800 1200 1700 yard 2700 maybe so I need to learn from groups that have been there and done that it's not for everyone but I have spare oil money and I want to use it to follow my heart
 
It's better to listen sometimes and keep the truth to yourself than to turn blue in the face with frustration from someone who thinks that they can pxss farther than you


I was at the firing range working on a rifle that was built by a friend 40 years ago, something went very wrong between the build day and the day I checked it. "Be aware of your surroundings": I noticed a man with a black rifle, he had gone through 100+ rounds without a hole in his target. He shot and continued to look up and down the line. I accomplished what I had started out to do and then took my spotter scope to his bench.

He said he was trying to get his nerve up to ask questions, he said he has narrowed down his choices to me. And I thanked him. He had two different brands of ammo, one was giving him grief, the Wolf would not chamber, I thought that was scarry so I had him get the Wolf off the table.

Then I started on the cause of no holes, he covered the complete target with paper, I shot 2 rounds at the very bottom center and hit the top left corner, that would be 4 1/2 ft. high at 50 yards and 1 foot to the left. I was impressed with the group. I used all the adjustment up on the scope to the right and shot two more rounds. I hit the top right corner and again I was impressed with the two shot group. I moved the scope to the center and shot one shot, the bullet hit the center line, still high. Then I went to lower the point of aim, the scope would go up but not down. I could have turn the scope 180 degree but that could have caused complications when making additional adjustments. I sent him to a smith in Irving.

He said he had $2,500 in the rifle with accessories, he claimed the shop he purchased it from installed the scope etc.. Then I noticed the rifle had sights mounted on the right side, just rotate the rifle 90 degree to the left and I thought that was awkward but had to try it. The rifle was dead on.

And then he apologized, he said he had made his mind up, he decided I would be the last person at the range to help him.

F. Guffey
 
Jason, I think you'll need a free-recoiling, cradle-mounted barreled action shooting at least 60 caliber, 1000 grain HPBT match bullets leaving near 3000 +/- 10 fps to get the accuracy I think you want to get way past a mile away.

No hand held, shoulder fired rifle will do that. They've got too much recoil to manage repeatable from shot to shot while the bullet goes through the barrel. None of us humans hand hold rifles the same way for every shot; even if it's also rested on something atop a firm platform.

What's the biggest 5-shot group size you desire at 2700 yards?

Is there someone's achievements in marksmanship that far away you want to emulate?
 
Last edited:
Talk about at thread drifting off topic.

06Shooter said:
When a bolt is closed on a cartridge , is the case head pushed into the recess of the bolt face underneath the extractor claw, or does the ignition phase of it push it under the extractor claw into the bolt face ?

Normally the head is loose by the amount of excess headspace beyond the size of the cartridge case's headspacing surface. If you chamber a rimless rifle cartridge rapidly, you can actually size the case down several thousandths just by how hard it is slammed into the shoulder of the chamber. I think Hatcher reported -0.006" of shoulder setback just from operating a 1917 Enfield bolt rapidly. Self-loaders obviously have enough bolt speed to do it, too, and if you extract a self-loaded round and measure it, you'll find it is shorter, too. Indeed, the SAAMI standards seem to depend on this being possible.

Take a look at the drawing here: http://saami.org/PubResources/CC_Drawings/Rifle/30-06%20Springfield.pdf. Remember, these are unilateral tolerances, so the number given is at the more critical end of the tolerance range, with the given tolerance only going in the less critical direction. This is a standard engineering practice. The more familiar plus or minus tolerance is used with a middle range value when neither direction is more critical than the other. In cartridges the maximum value is more critical and is the value given because a cartridge that is too big won't fit in a chamber at all, while a slightly too small one will still work. In a chamber the minimum value is critical and is the value given because a chamber that is too small won't accept a cartridge at all, while one that is slightly too big still functions, if not to best advantage. The only exceptions are for inside radii, which have to be the other way around to prevent an interference fit, and the with of the extractor groove, which cannot be too small.

Looking the drawing, the dimension from the case head of the cartridge to the 0.375" diameter shoulder datum is 2.0526-0.007". So the maximum is 2.0526" and the minimum is 2.0456". The chamber drawing below the cartridge has the dimension from the bolt face to to that same diameter on the shoulder at 2.0487-2.0587". It uses that format rather than a dimension and tolerance because this headspace determining range is a reference value. But look at those numbers closely. At 2.0526" the maximum "case headspace" is allowed to be 0.0039" longer than the minimum chamber headspace of 2.0487". The drawing allows an almost four thousandths interference fit!

How can it do that? We'll, for one, as Hatcher and self-loader owners have found, chambering can shorten the cartridge at the shoulder. It can happen because the minimum chamber diameters along the sides of the round are bigger than the maximum cartridge diameter. The chamber is a minimum of 0.0010" bigger at the head and .0015" bigger at the shoulder. This small clearance average 0.276% and is over a long enough over the 1.65" reference space, that 0.276% of that length is just over 0.004". Plus a little bit of the neck can lengthen forward. So there is plenty of room for that much interference, plus some fouling.

Typically, the maximum allowed headspace only occurs in heavily used guns who've gradually suffered enough locking lug setback for that difference to be seen. Rifle barrels have to be pretty inaccurate before the military rejects them, so that is the platform this occurs on. A match barrel has normally lost best accuracy and is replaced before the chamber grows that much.

Does that tight chamber fit mean a 0.001" hard particle could stop a shooter from closing the bolt on a minimum size chamber and a maximum size case? That might seem so in theory, but in practice, brass is so much softer than steel it will just put a tiny 0.001" dent in the brass, and do so without noticeable effect on loading or shooting.

The amount of chamber space allowed for typical new guns is no mystery. On average they are half way between the the minimum chamber length controlled by a headspace GO gauge, and a headspace NO GO gauge. For .30-06 these gauges are: 2.0487" and 2.0537", a 0.005" span. So the average .30-06 headspace is about 0.0025" over minimum and under maximum. A test gun barrel is precision chambered to within 0.0005" of minimum, and match barrels are often close to that. Other chamberings, like .308 Winchester, have a slightly tighter allowance.

So, then, what about the extractor? Look again at the SAAMI drawing. The rim, which has a surface that the extractor hook pulls on during extraction, has a tolerance of -0.010". The extractor groove in front of it is 0.033"+0.010". The wise manufacturer will plan to have the edge of the extractor claw fall in the middle that recess, so it will land about 0.0165 in front of a maximum thickness rim, and 0.0215" in front of an average thickness rim when the case head is firmly against the bolt face. Even with a maximum thickness rim, for it to reach the extractor claw during firing requires the case to move further forward than the headspace determining shoulder will allow, even when the case is chambered fast and shortened a few thousandths, as Hatcher measured it.

In normal firing, the firing pin just drives the case forward through the primer contact until its shoulder meet the chamber shoulder. As pressure starts to build, the case expands to meet the sides of the chamber. In a high power rifle, the pressure gets high enough before the bullet starts to move that the brass is stuck to the chamber wall by friction before the pressure can make it back up. This leaves the length of any excess headspace between the case head and the breech face. But the pressure is so high that the brass can't withstand it without support from the steel chamber, so when the head is forced back, what gives is the brass stretching where the inside of the head meets the case wall, forming and thinning the pressure ring.

That is what makes the rifle cases grow. When you resize the case later, that stretched portion, despite thinning a little, is still thicker than the brass near the shoulder, so it holds up to resizing forces while the shoulder gets pushed down, with the excess brass flowing into the neck. It's never 100% successful at making the turn from the shoulder angle to up the neck, so it overshoots a little, which is what forms the internal donut. But the extra brass has ultimately come from down at the pressure ring, so it doesn't need to be preserved, as there's no way to put it back down there. So there's nothing wrong with cutting the donut away with an inside reamer if your bullets seat down far enough for it to interfere with them. The .30-06 has such a long neck that this is only likely to happen with very long bullets. If you are shooting typical match bullets in the 180 grain range and below from this cartridge, you may never have to worry about it.

shouldersetbackandneckgrowth_zps15e9ff94.gif


The upper sectioned .308 case below shows the "dreaded donut". It also shows reamer marks from someone cutting away a previous donut, so this case was well used;

IMG_0507B_zpsvmd4wxvy.jpg
 
That's funny Mr F Guffey and you quote is very familiar! !!! I'm very impressed with myself on learning bits and pieces of the physics behind it all in the last 12 years my ranges limited me to pistols or 650 yards I'm a very.good shot and lucky as well (that's a way of not boasting) lol but in the last couple of months it seems something is guiding me and I am finding multiple answers to the same question and the common thread in all the answers is the truth I just use my senses and my metallurgy physics thermal dynamics metal fatigue failure analysis and other such training and schooling I've gone through to tell if someone is pulling my leg or they are speaking the language but with the 72 forums and the long range hunter online magazine applied ballistics berger Hornady noslier resource centers and more plus the two hours a day at the gun and ammo supply store where I befriended every employee and manager to the point of a 1200 dollar deduction on my 357 magnum automatic manager said you bought 6 guns in 6 months I'm giving you last year's prices 1200 it went up this year
They get that back with the thousands I spend there!!! As well as a non employee making sales when there buzy! !! But I gave a question I was going to use A max 208 grain in my 300 win mag it is 1.512 inches long and the ogive is .549 the BC of these two bullets are measured different so will skip it the noslier partition is. 1.453 inches and the ogive is .711 what bullet would you use there is almost a 1/5 of a inch difference in bearing surface !!! I'm mixed here because with a larger bearing surface f= PxA and we would have more bearing surface area equals less force on the lands but if we have a large number of larger passes the lands will wear as well !!
Bart B I would like to say that I got a bad vibe from you the first few times we meet but I understand that you are here to help and I wanted to say I respect you for helping all of us I see allot of people arguing but you never get mad your a cool guy thanks
 
Thanks Mr. Nick for highly detailed and informative explanation !
To everyone else too.
This will help me to understand what I will be doing and why I'm doing it as I put components together. Compared to the three manuals I have they are vague compared to questions answered here
Very great full !
 
Jason, you'll need a rifle and ammo combination that shoots no worse than 3/4 MOA at 1000 yards, properly tested, to keep all fired shots inside 30 inches at that range. 30 inches is the size of the 9 ring on NRA long range targets. Scores averaging 197 out of 200 for twenty record shots fired on it is what's needed to get the long range high master classification. 30 inch groups are what those top ranked competitors get at worst shooting prone with a sling.
 
Bart you seem to think I'm going to become a master rifle builder palma and f class shooter you seem like you need a student lol I figure if I come home early and a fellow runs out the back door I got enough time to get ready while he is driving and when he's around 1700 meters gone I can plant one right through the top of his hood mechanics are not cheap now lol !!!! I want to go and have fun I do not want stress from making a mistake it's all about the hobby it always has been
 
Back
Top