Carter mistook King wiretaps

Quote RE: Jimmy Carter:

"I said he is a good man, with a good heart."


Well, Neville Chamberlain may have had a good heart, but his weak knees managed to help contribute to a great deal to the death and suffering carried out by Hitler, during the second world war.

Jimmy Carters weakness and lack of resolve during the hostage crisis in Iran, was the worst thing to happen to the United States foriegn policy-wise, in the entire history of the country. We still pay for it to this day in terms of lives.

Just having the ability (due to taxpayer funded retirement of over $ 200 K per year for life) to go out and spend time tinkering on houses for the poor, does not make up for the damage resulting from his four pitiful years of disasterous foriegn policy.

To add insult to injury, he seems to spend a great deal more time meeting with every Communist Dictator imaginable, trying to help spread animosity and hatred for American citizens, than he spends tinkering on houses.

A good man with a great heart? I'd guess Benadict Arnold may have helped out at a few barn raising back in the late 1700's, but taken in total, I don't think hammering nails at a barn raising gives someone license to betray their country, and help ause the deaths and torture of innocent people.

Since the time Carter left office, all I have ever heard him do is criticize other Americans. But dictators such as Castro or Noriega, (having long been known for murdering their citizens) for the, he can find only praise. In fact, I cannot recall a single enemy of the United States, that Carter hasn't said something politically in support of.
 
Just a thought before you argue for them, will they argue for you?

Yes, the get some things wrong, all news agencies do, and they let biases out, all news agencies do. However, they are a source of information. Even if you view them as the enemy, isn't it good to know what the enemy is saying/thinking/doing so you can better fight them? The fact is they do do some good reporting.
 
Check out the Carter presidential library website sometime.

I checked it out last year :barf: and they claimed the release of the American hostages in Iran was a victory for Carter, a result of his "patient diplomacy" :eek: :barf:

ez45
 
I gather information on MY OWN from a VARIETY of DIFFERENT sources and MAKE MY OWN CONCLUSION.

Amazingly, this independant study seems to be lock-step with the left-wing pundits.

I think he only went so people, Dems and Reps alike, wouldn't say "why didn't GW Bush go to the funeral. Three former presidents did"

And the ability to read men's hearts and minds and discern their motives...fascinating!

this didn't seem like a normal funeral

Maybe, that's because she was a national icon. How many normal funerals do three ex-presidents and the sitting president attend?

I fail to see how this funeral was politicized.

Deny it all you will, it doesn't change the facts. If the Republicans had used Reagan's funeral to trash the Democrats, would you have failed to see that?

Need I continue...

You have revealed yourself as a partisan. Maybe no one ever told you or the thought never crossed your mind, but when one only totes the party line, on either side of the aisle, their arguments begin to hold less water. People may agree with what you're saying at the time, but they won't necessarily respect your opinion.
 
I don't think this funeral was a proper place for politics.

But I can't help but think that Ms King was cheering them on. :)
 
Back
Top