Quote from Fal 4 me:
"Connor, have you ever heard of a little legal saying we have in the U.S. "innocent UNTIL PROVEN guilty." There is also due process of law. What this means is that ANY American Bush has wiretapped is technically INNOCENT until the government takes them to court and they are found GUILTY by a jury or their peers."
Oh, yes sir, I assure you I have heard that term "innocent until proven guilty" tossed around somewhere. But we are not talking about crime. We are talking about preventing acts of war, commited against innocent civilians.
However, the heroes of the political left, seem to not have heard the term, as evidenced by the likes of Teddy Kennedy, et al stating almost daily in televised Senate meetings, "The President Broke the law".
There is a huge difference in wiretapping the incoming call of an enemy terrorist, and the wiretapping of an innocent citizen because (Kennedy and Johnson) believed one of his staff was a Communist Party member.
It is not illegal to be a Communist. So if it ever were revealed and they were tried, both Kennedy and Johnson would have been found guilty of a felony.
It is illegal however, to plot the murder of thousands. And it is legal, for the President to utilize his powers under the Constitution, and the War Powers Act, to protect our shores against attack. Anything less, would be illegal on his part.
So if you are concerned with innocence, have you ever heard of any little thing in our Country we call the World Trade Center Building?