Burst fire in the M16

I've never seen in action, but just looking at how it does what it does I wouldn't put in a rifle I had even if it was legal

And there are legal Registered Lightning Links (RLL's) and Registered Drop In Auto Sears (RDIAS's) out there that were registered and numbered prior to May '86. They can be made to work properly and safely, just ask Shaggy.:rolleyes:
 
Some great additional answers guys! Thanks.........Im gonna look at some links and see if I cant figure out the mechanics of it all.

Like I mentioned, full auto I get..........Semi auto I get. True burst seemed a bit confusing to me especially when it contains extra parts in the same frame.
 
m-16 Burst

Burst is just automatic with the trigger having a built in mechanism called the burst cam to lock the hammer down every third round.

After a round is fired in the m-16 the bolt is pushed backwards using gas from the gas tube. As the bolt is pushed back it pushes the hammer down and slides over the sear into the buffer spring. The hammer being pushed into the down position clicks the burst cam one click while the sear latches the hammer and keeps the hammer in place. As the buffer spring pushes the bolt forward into the locked position it contacts the sear pushing the top of the sear forward allowing the bottom of the sear to release the hammer which strikes the firing pin. This triggers the sequence again until three cycles are complete. Then the burst cam locks the hammer in the down position until the trigger is released and pulled again.
 

Attachments

  • CIMG1161.JPG
    CIMG1161.JPG
    63.6 KB · Views: 100
  • CIMG1163.JPG
    CIMG1163.JPG
    65.4 KB · Views: 86
  • CIMG1165.JPG
    CIMG1165.JPG
    63.1 KB · Views: 101
Last edited:
Burst fire was developed as a way to improve hit probability. Basically, by firing three rounds, you'd have a better chance to cover the target.

For CQ work, I personally think the way to engage with an AR is aimed rapid fire, pulling the trigger in a controlled fashion, spotting the strike of the rounds and walking them onto the target. Point shooting with a rifle, sort of.

With the new optics, it's probably quicker, more deliberate and better aimed, with fewer shots fired.

Do any of the young guys have experience with using burst fire like this? What's the state-of-the-art?

I think full-auto is for yay-hoos, except when very close...unless you have a Ppsh....or are very disciplined doing fire and maneuver with a team.
 
The Marine Corps got it right by keeping the older safe-fire-auto mode on their version of the M16.
No, they didn't. They have burst only except for the Recon Marines with M4A1s. All M16A2s, M16A4s, and M4s are burst only. The M4A1, used by SOCOM units and the Recon Marines, fires on full auto. No one uses the M16A3, which is the A2 with full auto.

As for how it works, there is a cam with three prongs to the right of the hammer pin hole on the hammer itself. Two will let the hammer fall forward again, the third always stops it. If you fire on burst and only hold the trigger long enough for two rounds to fire, the next trigger pull will only be one shot, even though it is still on burst. The next after that will be three shots, provided you hold it through all three rounds this time.
 
Burst mode is only necessary for covering fire, and then only when you don't have an available squad automatic weapon.

Otherwise semi is the best way to hit what you are shooting at. For CQB we are taught double-taps.
 
Maybe it is just a different way to look at it, but I would not say burst fire is to save ammunition, per se. Since it is difficult for a shooter with an M16 or M4 to get off more than 3 rounds in full auto before the muzzle goes off target, there is not much point in holding down the trigger and firing another 10 or 20 into the air. True two to four round bursts can be achieved by trigger control if enough time and ammunition is dedicated to training for that purpose. The hard fact is that the army (yes, and Marines) just can't spend days with a recruit doing nothing but practicing burst control in full auto fire. The burst fire capability is like an automatic transmission in a car - it is a mechanical means of achieving easily what only a lot of practice could do otherwise.

Stray thought: Most folks who talk a lot about how it should be done, haven't done it.

As to "bubba" FA conversions being dangerous, that is not true with a well made and properly installed DIAS or lightning link. Some people have tried to achieve FA fire by filing sears or some such, either allowing the hammer to follow the bolt down or to fall before the bolt is fully locked. In theory, the rifle cannot fire under those conditions, but such conversions are not the right way to go, and under certain conditions could allow fire out of battery, with almost certain destruction of the weapon.

Jim
 
Auto fire

Just to quickly address some things. For starters full auto isn't very difficult to control in the 5.56, you aren't going to be firing into the air after three rounds :rolleyes:

From personal experience I found burst to be choppy when trying to do rapid fire when compared to full auto. Full auto has steady recoil that you can to a degree compensate for while burst had a see-saw recoil effect making it more difficult to control.

Secondly it isn't hard to fire off short bursts from a full auto weapon. I almost got kicked off of a M249 range once for firing single shots during qualification on paper targets. Apparently you were supposed to try to use three round burst:confused:. Would have had expert except they subtracted ten hits for using single shot. Got called a cheater by those who didn't qualify but I didn't care, I'm a whatever works kinda guy.:p

As for full auto not being useful it works great during close ambushes and CQB. Firing volume to hit a target at close range is much easier than aiming on semi. It also better long range 300M+. It is extremely difficult to get a precision hit on a moving target at that range without FA, especially since you are only going to have a short window of opportunity to hit before the target takes cover. This would also apply to moving targets in a heavy woodline. Short window of opportunity plus little time to react means FA is handy.
 
Well of course everyone has their opinions. Mine personally well in a CQB environment, a failure to stop drill will do just fine. But in my experience an M4 can basically be used as a SAW in the right hands. It's all about your stance and how you hold your weapon. Doctrine today for the M16 or the M4 controlled pairs past 15 yards and hammer pairs from 15 and in. and of course one to the face. In the business we call this winning of hearts and minds. :) I can tell a simple way to change your AR to FA and not cost you a dime or cause permenent change to your weapon but we wont discuss that here. Gunsmithing is quite an art, good luck to you.
 
I can tell a simple way to change your AR to FA and not cost you a dime or cause permenent change to your weapon but we wont discuss that here. Gunsmithing is quite an art, good luck to you.

That is not what is being discussed here...
 
The M16 burst is a cool idea. Devil Dogs (USMC) do have burst on most of their M4 and M16's. The CAM in there is finikey at best. I personally dont like it, but some swear by it... cool idea non-the-less. There really isn't a real defacto answer as to why.. some people say it's because of round placement, some due to cost of ammo, some to the comabt panic factor... yadda yadda... who really knows? Its just 'one of those things'.

The full auto M16 will raise in the air. I've seen it with the newbies using the standard 'weaver' stance (trying to shoot the M16 like your standard hunting rifle). If you use the 'modern isosceles' stance a fairly-practiced person can keep all 30 rounds pretty close together and watching it it looks like the weapon vibrates in the persons hands. (feels like that too... just dont try to sit on it :-)).
 
One other occasion when burst is king...

...is on range day when everyone has qualified, there's a couple thousand rounds in mags sitting at the ammo station, and the chow hall closes in an hour. Nobody wants to break down mags, put them back in stripper clips, and recount, so that's when the training schedule changes to "sustained fire drills utilizing rapid magazine exchanges".

My reserve unit just got rid of their A1s this year. They all get sent somewhere in the South to be retooled into A2s. They mill out the "auto" and put a metal tab there for burst. i had an old FN at OBC that had been converted and seen many better days, but ut was still a real shooter. That's probably the most impressive thing about the M16 to me, that I can have one that is a nearly new Colt, and one a rehashed FN, and the sighting on the two was nearly the same (7 up on one, 7 up and one right on the other).
 
The hard fact is that the army (yes, and Marines) just can't spend days with a recruit doing nothing but practicing burst control in full auto fire. The burst fire capability is like an automatic transmission in a car - it is a mechanical means of achieving easily what only a lot of practice could do otherwise.

I don't think it is so much we cannot train people to do bursts, that only takes a couple of mags and anyone can manage 2-3 round burst. But under combat stress even guys with unlimited ammo allowances tend to fire much longer than optimal bursts.
 
I am no gunsmith but would like one to tell me how a FA weapon such as the M-249 SAW is capable of firing only one round at a time, if it is in complete working order.
 
"The trouble is that the Army doesn't really train its soldiers in trigger control"

They did when I went through basic training in the mid-80s. In fact, we were only permitted to go full auto a small handful of times so we could learn how to control our muzzles under sustained fire. All other times we were under strict orders to squeeze the trigger for 3-round maximum bursts. Failures to comply got you 40 pushups at best, or kicked off the range and assigned work detail at worst--and sometimes a good smack upside the head by a drill seargeant.
 
You don't need to be a gunsmith. You do however need some experience with the M-249! Trigger control. Its not an uzi for hell sake!
 
Phil
I remember those days! I always wondered what would posess a Drill Instructor to kick the head of an 18 yr old kid with 20 rnds in an automatic weapon! Happened plenty though!!
 
Mechanical burst is cheaper than training folks to use their fingers and discipline.


I don't like the different trigger pulls with the burst cam, nor the having to complete a cycle.
 
Back
Top