A Dr can't look at a superficial wound and tell you exactly what caused itDoctors told her that a bullet entered and exited her scalp
VANCOUVER, Wash. – The Clark County Sheriff’s Office said Monday that it could not find any evidence that a stray bullet from a rifle range hit and wounded a Brush Prairie woman.....
It also said it could not determine from which direction it came; however, investigators couldn’t rule out that the object did come from the rifle range.
“Investigators are unable to make any determination that the injuries were the result of criminal intent, recklessness or negligence at this time,” the sheriff’s office said in a news release. “Since there is no evidence of criminal activity this investigation is suspended.”
Who was there first? Was the range built before the house was? If so, grandfather law.
The Sheriffs office investigation found no EVIDENCE she was struck by a bullet.
Quote:
The Sheriffs office investigation found no EVIDENCE she was struck by a bullet.
Yep, the sheriff's office also found no evidence she was not struck by a bullet. Given the fact that the sheriff's office has not inspected that range since 1996, i'm not surprised.
When did it become the sheriff job to inspect firing ranges?
The On Your Side Investigations also raised questions about inspections at the shooting range. KATU obtained a 1996 license that showed Clark Rifles was subject to inspection by the Clark County Sheriff's Office every five years.
When KATU asked Neiman about this, he wasn't sure if the inspections were carried out but said he would look into the matter.
McCauley said he also placed a call to Neiman to see if the inspections had been carried out as stated in the license.
"Certainly, when the county issues a license for a a dangerous activity, we have a responsibility to make sure that that activity is carried on safely," McCauley said.