Browning/Saive/FNH Hi-Power question

mrentropy

New member
Hi,

I'd like to acquire a Hi-Power 9mm stamped with Fabrique National, Herstal. My understanding is that Browning is actually a distributor, and their Hi-powers stamped "Browning Hi-Power" are actually manufactured by FN in Belgium (right?).

That's fine, but is it possible, in the US, to buy a new Hi-Power that's actually stamped by FNH instead of Browning? I prefer the original wood grips, not the Mark III design (just b/c that's what I'm used to, from the Hi-Power already in the family taken back to the states from WWII European theater....).

I've looked and so far as I can tell, nobody sells what I'm looking for, but I'm not remotely an expert.

Thanks.
 
There are some very used Israeli trade in FN P35s.
You would probably have to scrounge some wood grips to replace the plastic, and refinish for good appearance; but many if not all of them have the FN logo.
 
mrentropy Hi,

I'd like to acquire a Hi-Power 9mm stamped with Fabrique National, Herstal. My understanding is that Browning is actually a distributor, and their Hi-powers stamped "Browning Hi-Power" are actually manufactured by FN in Belgium (right?).
Browning Arms is the US importer, and Federal law requires the importers name be marked on the firearm. All Browning Hi Powers are manufactured by FN, but not all FN Hi powers were imported by Browning.


That's fine, but is it possible, in the US, to buy a new Hi-Power that's actually stamped by FNH instead of Browning?
No, but you might find a nearly new or like new HP with no Browning rollmark. They are seen quite often on Gunbroker.

For a short while, FN used both Browning (owned by FN) and FNMI (also owned by FN) to import HP's. Browning was supposedly to focus on the commercial sales, FNMI on government sales. This duplication caused FN to cease importing HP's through FNMI. I believe this stopped around 2006.
 
The only way to obtain a current BHP in the U.S. without it having gone through Browning would be to find someone who bought it on the market outside the U.S. and brought it in privately. Any commercial importation would have to be through Browning, the U.S. distributor.

Jim
 
mrentropy, CDNN Closed out a bunch of new FN marked MKIII Hi Powers a few years ago. Most had plastic grips, easily changed. I'd guess there must be some of these, New Old Stock, still floating around. I bought a couple from CDNN myself.
 
Browning is currently owned by FN. Bought 'em in 1977. U.S. Repeating Arms Company(Winchester) in 1987.
Herstal is the city in Belgium where FN's head office and plants are located.
Anyway, there are lots of Belgian made BHP's on the assorted auction sites. There's one on Gunbroker right now sitting at $399. Looks kind of rough though. Most of 'em are running about $450ish.
All currently made Browning Hi Powers are manufactured by FN. Not all of 'em.
 
As far as I'm concerned, a Hi-Power is a Hi-Power.

The Browning HPs I've seen (and the one I own) are typically prettier (better finish) than the FN models, but except for that -- the variations in levers and grips -- it didn't seem to make much difference about which one you were shooting. The BHP seem to command a somewhat higher price than the FN models, but I'm sure there are many variations and exceptions.
 
They all run off the same lines with different rollmarks. If you want a FN rollmark over a Browning rollmark ok but they will be harder to find and you will pay more for a LNIB gun stock with original grips. There will be no NIB FN rollmarked guns in the US unless it is very old new stock. We are talking almost 10 years +.

The only current production BHPs are MKIIIs. All the BHPs imported into the US are Browning rollmarked. MKIII with FN rollmarks will be CDNN closeouts on the used market or true surplus guns. FN does not import FN rollmarked BHPs anymore.

I would look for BHP Standard which will come in gloss blue and have wood grips. These are available NIB if you have to have a NIB gun. If you were you I would look for a LNIB Browning or FN rollmark C series or T series and buy the best condition one in your price range but what do I know about BHPs











 
Last edited:
"Every Browning Hi Power since day one has been manufactured by FN."

I think that may be a semantics game. Guns in all respects identical to the FN High Power have been made in Canada by Inglis, and under license in Argentina and reportedly in India. Unlicensed copies have been made in Hungary and elsewhere. FN has had them assembled in Portugal from Belgian-made parts, so they didn't "all come off the same assembly line" in Belgium.

Except for the guns made by the Browning Brothers in Utah over a century ago, Browning and the company named for him never made any production guns. Browning himself was a free-lance designer, selling or licensing his designs to manufacturers.

Jim
 
James K
"Every Browning Hi Power since day one has been manufactured by FN."
I think that may be a semantics game. Guns in all respects identical to the FN High Power have been made in Canada by Inglis, and under license in Argentina and reportedly in India. Unlicensed copies have been made in Hungary and elsewhere.
Taurus makes revolvers that look identical to S&W revolvers, it wouldn't be semantics to call them what they really are would it?:rolleyes:

Call it semantics if you like, but Browning Hi Power usually means a Browning Arms Hi Power as opposed to an FEG or FM (Fabrica Militar) Hi Power. Further, FEG made one version of a "Hi Power" that isn't remotely similar in design to the real thing.

Fabrique Nationale even threatened legal action when FM of Argentina dropped their license and began producing unlicensed Hi Powers with the word F.N. BROWNING on the slide. The Argentines knew the marketing value of the word Browning, so does FN.


The Inglis Hi Power while similar, is not identical to the FN Hi Powers. Every collector knows what an Inglis Hi Power is. The Indian Inglis clones are just that, a clone of the Inglis design.


FN has had them assembled in Portugal from Belgian-made parts, so they didn't "all come off the same assembly line" in Belgium.
Who said anything different?:rolleyes:


Except for the guns made by the Browning Brothers in Utah over a century ago, Browning and the company named for him never made any production guns. Browning himself was a free-lance designer, selling or licensing his designs to manufacturers.
True, but JMB never sold his designs to FEG did he?;)
 
James K said:
"Every Browning Hi Power since day one has been manufactured by FN."

I think that may be a semantics game. Guns in all respects identical to the FN High Power have been made in Canada by Inglis, and under license in Argentina and reportedly in India. Unlicensed copies have been made in Hungary and elsewhere. FN has had them assembled in Portugal from Belgian-made parts, so they didn't "all come off the same assembly line" in Belgium.

Except for the guns made by the Browning Brothers in Utah over a century ago, Browning and the company named for him never made any production guns. Browning himself was a free-lance designer, selling or licensing his designs to manufacturers.

There are a lot of things wrong with this post. I am not sure that Jim bothered to look at the OP before posting. If he did he would realize that the OP is looking for something which currently does not exist. A NIB non MKIII FN rollmarked Browning Hi Power in the US. :eek: He is not looking for a Inglis HP, FEG clone or FM HP. He is looking for a legit FN Herstal rollmarked BHP.

Even without that part there are some issues with your post Jim.

James K said:
Guns in all respects identical to the FN High Power have been made in Canada by Inglis...

The Inglis guns are no where near identical. You might call this semantics but most BHP historians and collectors make a distinction between these 2 lines because of the differences in the design. They were reversed engineered in Canada under the direction of Saive. They used British tracings of the FN produced HPs to create the blueprints for the Inglis HPs. They were close but far from identical. They were produced with FNs blessing to fullfill a contract for the Chinese, 5,000 pistols IIRC, and they continued to produce them after that. Here is a decent write up on them. http://www.ai4fr.com/main/page_militaria__collectibles_canada_inglis.html

James K said:
...under license in Argentina and reportedly in India.

FN did lic the production of BHPs to Argentina and they were produced originally on FN machinery to FN specs. So although they were produced outside of the Herstal plant one could argue that they were still manufactured by FN. I do not take that route but instead consider them lics clones. As pointed out FM continued to produce them after the lic had expired and at that point I consider them unlicensed copies. FM also made modifications to the design after the lic expired further muddying the water.

IIRC the India contract was with Inglis. They never produced an actual FN/BHP. They bought their equipment from Inglis. So they are born of that line of pistols not FN Herstals.

As to all the other clones out there, FEG, Kareem, Charles Daly etc... they are clones. They are not true Browning Hi Powers anymore than a Taurus 1911 is a Colt 1911. When one refers to the BHP they are referring to the gun produced by FN Herstal not clones or lic copies. That makes the statement "Every Browning Hi Power since day one has been manufactured by FN" true IMHO.

James K said:
FN has had them assembled in Portugal from Belgian-made parts, so they didn't "all come off the same assembly line" in Belgium.

All current production BHPs, which is what the OP is looking for all come off the same lines. They have all come off the same lines in Portugal since the early 70s. IIRC. Originally they were not marked "assembled in Portugal". The parts are manufactured in Belgium. The assembled in Portugal Rollmarks has never been fully explained. The common explanation is that FN misunderstood an import regulation and rollmarks the guns this way. It was deemed unnecessary but they never changed it. So please explain to me how all BHPs do not come off the same assembly line. They used to roll off the lines at FN Herstal in Belgium until about 1971 and since then roll off the ones in Portugal. ;)

James K said:
Except for the guns made by the Browning Brothers in Utah over a century ago, Browning and the company named for him never made any production guns. Browning himself was a free-lance designer, selling or licensing his designs to manufacturers.

By the time JMB helped to design the Grande Rendement, which became the BHP, he was not a freelance designer. He had a contract with Colt and FN Herstal which divided up the world in terms of JMB designs. The Grande Rendement was designed for a French contract which FN decided to attempt to win. The BHP was not adopted by the French under that contract.

Again these might be a semantics game but to those who love the BHP they are historical facts. :D
 
Last edited:
BHP

Wow such a lot of Info on the BHP's from the original post. I love the BHP pistols and I have purchased the Israeli imports. Some are great and others have certainly been beat up. After shooting plastic guns for a while, a true steel pistol feels great. The handle fits my hand great but the different sights have me baffled at times. I have one with the 3 dot sights and I believe I shoot it the best.
 
James K said:
"Every Browning Hi Power since day one has been manufactured by FN."

I think that may be a semantics game. Guns in all respects identical to the FN High Power have been made in Canada by Inglis, and under license in Argentina and reportedly in India. Unlicensed copies have been made in Hungary and elsewhere. FN has had them assembled in Portugal from Belgian-made parts, so they didn't "all come off the same assembly line" in Belgium.

It's not a semantics issue. The excerpt you cited wasn't about all Hi-Powers, but about Browning Hi-Powers... Browning factories never made HPs -- Browning imported them from day one from FN. All Browning Hi-Powers were built by FN. And, FN HPs and BHPs WERE all built on the same assembly line -- the assembly line was just moved. Copies, licensed or unlicensed, weren't BHPs. They were copies of FN HPs guns.

The guns built in Canada (the Inglis) and the guns copied elsewhere (in both licensed and unlicensed forms) were all variations of the basic FN design. Browning's guns were based on the same FN design. I had an Inglis for a while, and it didn't have Browning on the slide. My Inglis was a dog, and I later traded it away -- it had been refinished and had no collector value. It was going to take more $gunsmith dollars to make it shootable than it was worth. I could and did buy a used BHP for a reasonable price. Still have THAT one.

The original Browning design (patent documents can be found online) were for a single-stack, striker-fired gun. That isn'th Hi-Power being discussed. I'm not sure folks in Europe even call it a Browning Hi-Power.
 
Last edited:
Pardon my ignorance, but I didn't even know that the early Hi Powers weren't marked with the Browning rollmark. Admittedly, I haven't even really looked at a newer HP and most of my experience is with the older version.

But my curiosity was piqued and I took another look at mine. Yep, it has the Browning rollmark. It is a "C" series and so dates from 1969. So, the question I have is, besides the ones made for government contracts, when did they produce them without the Browning rollmark?

IMG_2621-XL.jpg



It has been carried a bunch and the once beautiful deep blue has been worn off of every high point on it
 
"By the time JMB helped to design the Grande Rendement, which became the BHP, he was not a freelance designer. He had a contract with Colt and FN Herstal which divided up the world in terms of JMB designs."

He wasn't an employee of either Colt or FN.

That makes him a freelance designer whose services are under contract for a specified period/time.


As for the gun itself, I don't care what my Hi Power is marked. I love the thing.
 
I don't consider someone a freelance designer when their designs are exclusively owned by one of two companies which was the case with JMB. He was not "free" to design guns for anyone but Colt and FN at the time of the birth of the BHP and his death.
 
As for the gun itself, I don't care what my Hi Power is marked. I love the thing.

Sometimes it takes only a few words to say what many believe.

I also am a fan of the BHP, except the .40S&W version. It was not balanced well and didn't stay in my collection long.

I did own one of the India-made BHP models (there, did I get the semantics right?) and it was obviously made on the Inglis machinery. It had the Inglis hump under the rear sight, which I think is a neat feature. And it was crudely finished. The front sight was crookedly staked into the dovetail.

But now I kick myself for not keeping that Ishapore BHP (there, did I get the semantics right?) and letting Cylinder and Slide or somebody equally talented build a nice-looking custom gun out of it. Oh well, I can't go back.

Speaking of nice looking, WVSig, your pictures are 1st rate. And the guns are also :D

Bart Noir
 
Back
Top