BP for HD?

Springfield Kid said:
Looks like some folks don`t watch the news , guys this is 2009
Click to expand...

What's that supposed to mean?

If you are referring to just simply keeping a C&B Revolver loaded & at the ready as your only H/D weapon, then think again.
The OP stated that he already has a 9mm & a .22 this in my thoughts would be in addition to what he already had.
Me I have 2 .45ACP's, a 12ga., & a .45-70 in addition to my C&B revolvers & other Muzzleloaders as I'm sure others here have as well.

Please explain........
 
I`ll try to explain my 2009 way of thinking about home defence .
I have a friend that thought a black powder hawken rifle was good enough for home defence , he lives rual area , no high crime district .
One Sat. around 9:30 in the evening he and his 2 children and wife were home watching the TV , his front door was kicked in and 3 guys armed with AK47`s rushed in and, he ran for his trusty Hawken which was behind his bedroom door .
He fired his Hawken but it missed its mark , he was shot once and left for dead .
When the smoke cleared , he had lost his wife and both his children .
Why did this happen ? His sister in law told him his wife had a drug problem she was hidding from him , she owed a drug dealer 10,000 and this was the way they collect .
I see nothing cool about defending ones self against the weapons of this day and time with anything black powder .
The bad guys may be better armed than you think , I suppose you can say this could never happen to you . Like I said Good Luck !
 
Point taken but in a situation like that, no mere handgun no matter what it was "that is legal for the ordinary citizen to have" would have been sufficient of a defence firearm & hence my comment that if you need more than 5 shots from a handgun to take care of a B/G then you are under armed because you in a WAR.

You have to admit to yourself though, a situation like that is not the norm & in most situations a pump shotgun w/3-6 shots, semi auto pistol w/6+ shots or a revolver w/5-6 shots "be it a C&B or modern" is usually all that is needed to take care of a home invasion cituation if the home owner got to their weapon with enough time to make a stand.

Some one like me does just as much shooting with his C&B revolvers as he does his modern firearms & knows them very well can be a formidable oponent if that was by chance the weapon that was at hand, I wouldn't suggest any one to just rely on a C&B revolver as their only H/D firearm but have it at the ready as a second possible weapon to use unless this is all they have at the time.
 
There were lots of cartridge guns around, but a lot of the old timers still used the cap and ball pistols. They said that you couldn't beat a round ball from a cap and ball pistol when it came to killing a man, and these were Civil War cavalry veterans who knew all about killing.
Click to expand...

They said nothing was better because they were fixed in their ways, stuck in their comfort zone of what was appropriate, unwilling to move on with better technology.

And a cap and ball during the Civil War was considered some of the best technology of the day, no doubt, but times have moved on and better guns and ammunition with better slugs are available.

hence my comment that if you need more than 5 shots from a handgun to take care of a B/G then you are under armed because you in a WAR.
Click to expand...

No, you are just in a really good fight. After all, you may have to deal with more than one bad guy. With an average bad guy hit rate of 20-40%, shooting him once or twice with 5 shots may not be enough.
 
They said nothing was better because they were fixed in their ways, stuck in their comfort zone of what was appropriate, unwilling to move on with better technology.

And a cap and ball during the Civil War was considered some of the best technology of the day, no doubt, but times have moved on and better guns and ammunition with better slugs are available.


Nein! This story posted by Gatofeo stated that these guys had tried the cartridge pistols. There was a .38 that was popular at the time, but these Civil War veterans said that the cap and ball round ball was a better man killer.
My own experience backs up this point of view.
I have killed over 60 deer with the 30-06.
I have killed 7 deer and 7 wild hogs with a patched round ball from a .50 muzzleloader.
Any day of the week the patched round ball is a better deer and hog killer.
 
As an added consideration/question, if there were to be a fire in the home (nothing to do with home invasion) would a person be less likely to have stray bullets flying if they had a cartridge gun in a holster by their bed or if they had a C&B pistol?
 
Heck, NO! Cap-and-ball revolvers are not good for home defense. You might kill someone with that thing, and we all know the idea is to wound so they can sue!;)

i assume you're talking about a c&b pistol?
which if that's the case, no i don't think it's a good idea to trust something like that.
you would have to leave the thing capped at all times and that's just not totally cool.
Click to expand...

At first, I thought you were saying this to mean that a capped cap-and-ball revolver just sitting holstered by a bed was somehow less safe or reliable than a capped cartridge revolver. But then you say,

there would be two nipples, over two charged cylinders, with two exposed caps.
caps that could fall off, or worse catch an inopportune bump or knock.
depending on the model gun, it might only be one cylinder, but still........

these things are not regulated by drop tests.
Click to expand...

Now you've confused me. Here you are implying that a capped cap-and-ball revolver is less safe than a capped cartridge revolver while being handled.

If you've done much cap-and-ball shooting with the correct components, you'd know that a properly fitting cap is highly unlikely to "fall off" a nipple. It's a real pain in the rear to uncap such a revolver using a finger nail or even a tool.

As for drop tests, load up all six chambers of a cap-and-ball revolver and set the hammer on the catch between chambers. Then go drop your gun, hammer first, on concrete. Bet it doesn't go "BOOM" 100 out of 100. Better yet, load five chambers and set the hammer on the nipple of the unloaded chamber and do the same "drop test". Bet it doesn't go "BOOM" 110 out of 100!:rolleyes:

Looks like some folks don`t watch the news , guys this is 2009
Click to expand...

That's right, guys. Black powder turns more and more impotent at the turn of each century. Didn't y'all know that?

I`ll try to explain my 2009 way of thinking about home defence .
I have a friend that thought a black powder hawken rifle was good enough for home defence , he lives rual area , no high crime district ....
Click to expand...

A Hawken?!!! You are comparing a single shot rifle to a cap-and-ball revolver??! Why not compare it to a modern defense revolver like a double action Smith & Wesson? What's the difference? Obviously a rifle is not a very good defense weapon within the confines of a room in the first place, let alone a SINGLE SHOT:rolleyes: Not a good comparison at all.

Aaanyyywaaay, a cap-and-ball revolver would not be my first choice as a home defense weapon, given anything better. However, a cap-and-ball revolver is just as formidable today as it has always been, and I pity the poor fool who has to personally find this out the hard way.
 
My thoughts exactly, if the person knows their chosen weapon is key to having a fighting chance in the first place regardless if they have a C&B Revolver or a modern day handgun.

I too wouldn't suggest having a C&B Revolver as the primary defence firearm but if it was the weapon that got into the hands first I wouldn't feel under gunned by no means.
 
Is there a resource somewhere that reviews actual cases of self or home defense and summarizes them? For example, if 90% of the real life instances of home defense involve less than five shots fired by the defender at a distance of 20 feet or less (the size of a living room) then I would imagine CAS shooters could possibly do well regardless of whether they're shooting C&B or cartridge rounds as long as they're using the revolvers they're used to using. However, if real life is vastly different - for example if most real life home defense instances involve 17 rounds fired by the defender - or multiple assailants with multiple semi-automatic pistols - then that might suggest C&B revolvers would be very inadequate (unless you were the kind of person who could handle the stress and aim *very* well under fire). Where can you find what's realistic to expect and what's an extremely unlikely scenario?
 
(3) Only load 5 Shots!
Any C&B revolver no matter which one you have has no real safety by comparison to todays firearms so keeping the hammer on an empty chamber while in your house is just a safty suggestion, if you need more than 5 shots to get rid of some B/G then you ned more than a pistol son because you are in a WAR.
Click to expand...

Most all C&B revolvers have a notch between cylinders that capture the hammer (Remingtons) or a pin between cylinders(Colts) that the hammer rests on. They are just as safe as any SA center fire with it's hammer on a empty cylinder. Seal the caps and long term storage is not a issue.

If you plan on using a gun for SD you better be familiar with it, be it C&B or center fire. A C&B would not be my first choice but if it's all I had I would not feel under gunned.
 
As for drop tests, load up all six chambers of a cap-and-ball revolver and set the hammer on the catch between chambers. Then go drop your gun, hammer first, on concrete. Bet it doesn't go "BOOM" 100 out of 100. Better yet, load five chambers and set the hammer on the nipple of the unloaded chamber and do the same "drop test". Bet it doesn't go "BOOM" 110 out of 100!
Click to expand...

right. but what about that capped cylinder hanging out in the breeze there?
can you guarantee that nothing hard will ever come in contact with it....ever?
an 1860 is tucked in there a bit better than 1858, but still.
if it's all you have, well then it is indeed better than nothing. but if it's nothing more than a range toy why play with fire when it comes to protecting those you care about?

and the cloud of smoke, what happens if you employ that tactic of flash bang, and the goblin starts poking and hoping with his 9mm that carries 15 or 16 rds?
i mean seriously if you need to pull the trigger, game time has passed. when you squeeze it's stop the threat time.

if you feel comfortable with using one for hd, that's one thing, but encouraging somebody else to do the same, that may or may not be as familiar with the gun is foolishness.
in one of the posts on the first page the OP is asking if it's ok to load 6 and keep the hammer down on one or at half cock. so right there he is not totally familiar with the safe handling of them.

i'm sorry but home defense is no joke. maybe you never need to do it. but if only ever even once you need to strike in anger, why would you rely on a weapon that stacks the odds against you before you even start.
i would think taking steps to stack in your favor would rank pretty high on the list. starting off with a six gun, that is most safely stored with only five cylinders live, is not starting on the right foot.
 
Last edited:
Must be the romance of the old west fogging the mind that would make a man think his sexy 1860 Colt cap gun is all he needs in a modern world gun fight .
If these cap guns are all one needs to defend ones self explain to me why our our police now carry 9mm with 16 round mags .
Why heck Barney all you need in one bullet , and you need to keep it in your shirt pocket . :rolleyes:
 
If we take your scenario as the standard we all need two guys on guard duty plus 3 fully loaded AK's. Is that what you're recommending? I didn't think so, but you did say that story explained your way of thinking about 2009 home defense.

Back off the hyperbole. Nowhere in this thread or elsewhere in this or any other forum has anyone even remotely suggested that a single shot bp rifle was an adequate defense against 3 aggressors with semiautomatic weapons. You don't win arguments by misstating your opponents position with an absurdity. Unless, of course, you're a professional politician.
 
Lead C&B-BP or a modern 9mm with premium hollowpoint not even close. C&B 1800's 9mm hp 2009. What r ya thinking?:eek:
 
Last edited:
Nein! This story posted by Gatofeo stated that these guys had tried the cartridge pistols. There was a .38 that was popular at the time, but these Civil War veterans said that the cap and ball round ball was a better man killer.
Click to expand...

Well, you got me there. Post Civil War cartridge rounds (which were BP) are obviously much better than any modern cartridges and so since some old fogies from the Civil War preferred cap and ball over BP cartridges, then cap and ball must be superior to anything we have today. :rolleyes:


My own experience backs up this point of view.
I have killed over 60 deer with the 30-06.
I have killed 7 deer and 7 wild hogs with a patched round ball from a .50 muzzleloader.
Any day of the week the patched round ball is a better deer and hog killer.
Click to expand...

Well, if a .50 patched ball muzzle loader is better for killing deer and hog than your claimed 30.06, then a cap and ball revolver must be better for self defense than any modern handgun with a modern smokeless powder cartridge. I don't know why this wasn't clear to me previously.

Of course, Wyatt Earp stated that the best way to stop a man was with a gut shot, yet for some reason we go with COM and center of chest shots nowadays...and Wyatt Earp was a man who knew killing.

Well, I am off to ride ole Betsy down to the telegraph office to send a message to the territorial Governor to let him know what I have learned this evening.
 
"Yes", a cap-and-ball revolver is more than adequate for most home defense purposes. "No", a cap gun is not.

A "cap gun" is a toy for those here who are confused about the terms. Since there are a few here who don't seem all that familiar with the potentials of black powder arms, here's a little lesson in firearms basics for you guys. The term "cap-and-ball revolver" refers to a black powder revolver design which is primed with what is called a "percussion cap", and the projectile is usually a lead sphere, call a "ball". The propellant used is black powder, which really is an exlosive, not merely a "propellant".

The only difference between a cap-and-ball revolver and a cartridge revolver is that the cap-and-ball revolver uses the walls of it's cylinders to contain the charges and projectiles, while a cartridge gun uses separate brass cases to hold these components, as well as the percussion cap, which is called a "primer" in centerfire cartridges. A primer in a case is, for all practical discussion here, the same as a percusion cap on a nipple (Yes, for you that don't know it, "nipple" is a legitimate black powder term;)). The chain of firing is the same: hammer strikes priming charge, priming charge ignites main charge, main charge burns and produces gases that propel the projectile down the barrel. It really doesn't make any difference whether the components are self-contained, or contained only within the walls of the chambers; That projectile is on it's deadly way toward the shooter's target in either case.

Now that you have some knowledge and we should all be on the same page, do yourselves a favor and understand that a cap-and-ball firearm is extremely lethal. A cap gun, it is not.:rolleyes:
 
MyKeal & Model P Please go back and read the title of this thread , it doesn`t say anything about Cap & Ball revolvers for home defence .
It says BP for HD
would that not mean Black Powder for Home Defence ?
In my mind Black power guns Rock Locks =( flint locks to Model P ) and Cap Guns =( for Model P meaning every thing from cap & ball revolvers to front stuffing single shot rifles and every thing in between that requires a cap )
Now that wasn`t so hard was it .
 
is BP a viable home defense tool? And does anybody use it?
Click to expand...

Maybe, and Not personally.

I don't like to take unnecessary chances with my, or my loved ones lives. I personally deem a BP pistol an unneeded liability. There are great advancements in handgun reliability, and ammunition type, not too mention handgun power and speed. With all that being said, my HD weapon of choice is a Remington 870 with 00Buck in the waiting, and slugs as backup.

One could argue that it is viable, but there are BETTER tools for the job at hand.
 
no offense intended, but stupidity wasnt the reason that peopel kept using bp revolvers past expiration of rollin whits patent.

colt charged uncle sams checkbook 25-30 dollars for every colt percussion revolver sold to him during the civil war. At that time most soldiers were barely making 15 dollars amonth for the privilege of dying for a war they didnt beleive in.
When colt started producing cartridge revolvers, ie masons and richards, etc, he was still charging 25-30 dollars for each weapon. For normal citizens, 20 dollars a month in pay was extremely wealthy, many werent making more then 15 a month in some areas.
as a result pappy and uncle johny were happy to keep carrying their gov issued percussion revolver because it was still accurate, still able to kill a man, and could still knock a horse down. Also, economics proved that it was cheaper to purchase a pound of bp and some percussion caps then to try to keep a good supply of cartridges on hand.


Also, the few shootings involving a percussion revolver that have happened in the last 12 years in my state always have ended up with "home robber killed after being shot with col. colts equalizer". While i can show you several articles about shootings involing semi autos in 9mm, 40sw and 45acp that involved multiple chest shots with jhp that resulted in injury but no deaths.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top