Prof Young said:
I would think that ideally it seats all the way to the bottom of the primer pocket.
Deeper than that. If you look at a primer, it has a brass (often nickel plated) or hard copper cup, and inside the mouth of the cup is a metal piece called the anvil, which looks like an inverted tripod or bipod, depending on the primer design. Between the bottom of the cup and the inverted tip of the anvil is the priming mix pellet, usually with a paper or plastic or foil cover (this cover is called the foil regardless of what it is made of). It often also has a lacquer water resistant seal applied over all that.
The idea is that when the firing pin strikes the primer, it squashes the pellet smartly between the inside bottom of the cup and the tip of the anvil. The "smartness" of the blow is determined by the kinetic energy behind the firing pin. Each primer has a rating for that energy that is based on priming an empty case, placing it upside down in a holder with a floating firing pin laying nose down on top of the primer, then dropping a weight on it. The kinetic energy of a dropped weight is proportional to the height it is dropped from, as long as it doesn't get going so fast that air resistance becomes significant. So the test just rates primer sensitivity in terms of the height the weight is dropped from. Below is an example of military primer sensitivity specs.
The problem with the above is you have to be careful to ensure nothing can mitigate the energy transfer from the firing pin to the primer. If your primer is only seated part way into the primer pocket, then a portion of the energy in the firing pin is absorbed by first knocking the anvil loose, then finishing seating the primer cup. That extra work leaves less energy to ignite the primer, and is a common cause of misfires for that reason. Another, smaller factor is the foil acts like a small cushioning pad. Still another is that some primers may have thicker pellets than others, and a thick pellet can theoretically cushion the firing pin strike, too. These last two factors can be handled by "setting the bridge" of priming mix between the cup and anvil, or "reconsolidating" (as in squeezing together) the primer parts.
Here's how that works: Notice that an unfired primer's anvil has its two or three little feet protruding slightly beyond the mouth of the primer cup. This serves two purposes. One is that because the anvil is narrower than the cup—actually able to press down inside it–having the feet protrude means that they touch the floor of the primer pocket before the mouth of the primer cup can run into whatever radius the corner at the outer edges of the floor may have. That eliminates one possible source of shock absorption at firing pin impact. The other is it compresses the foil and squeezes the primer pellet to a more uniform thickness. Alan Jones points out there was a time when priming mix was brittle, but no more. You will not make it crumble doing this.
Getting the above correct makes the primer optimally sensitive. It also causes the ignition to be more uniform in speed than with a primer merely touching the bottom of the pocket. This is important for maximum rifle accuracy at long range. It allows you to get velocity SD down below the 10 fps range, where that can be hard or impossible to do at rifle velocities (10 fps is a pretty small percentage of a typical high power rifle velocity) without careful primer seating.
There are different ways to go about getting consistent primer seating. First, you can do what manufacturers do, and that is seat primers to a fixed depth that produces the right result on average. Remington and Winchester have reconsolidation ranges for compressing the anvil into the cup of 0.002" to 0.006". Their case primer pockets have ±0.001" depth tolerance, which eats up half that range. The rest allows for primer differences. In the end, you wind up about 0.004" below flush with the head of the case as the target value.
The
Dillon 1050 press seats primers that way on the handle down-stroke in one of its eight stations. It is a good way for a manufacturer to work because he knows his own brass. For the Dillon it will work best for long range rifle ammo only when you use brass with the same rim thickness, as rim thickness variation alters the seating depth produced by the Dillon mechanism. It is fully adjustable, but you want to have all your cases the same rim thickness for any given adjustment.
A method that works with any rim thickness is built into the
Forster Co-ax press. This seats the primer with a ram that has a shoulder on it that stops against the case head. The center portion that drives the primer protrudes beyond that shoulder to follow the primer up into the primer pocket, setting it at the correct depth. It is a one-at-a-time tool, though. I have one of these, and rather than handle primers individually, I have primed rifle cases on a Lee tool while watching TV, then run them through the Co-ax press to set final primer seating depth. It seems to take less time that way, and I find this is a good slamfire countermeasure with ammo destined for floating firing pin self-loaders.
Yet another method of accomplishing the above that is also immune to rim thickness variation is achieved with the
Sinclair priming tool. It can be set up with shims to produce any exact final depth you might seek. It is also a one-at-a-time operation, but it lets you finish in front of the TV.
As a practical matter, these days primer pellet thickness is pretty uniform, so that pellet thickness variation in the final bridge thickness is not the issue it originally was. Being relieved of that concern gives you another option, and one I find works very well, but is very slow going. This is to use the
K&M Primer Gauge tool. This tool has you place the case in it as if you were going to primer it, but with no primer, and then put the primer anvil-down on a little pedestal so that a dial indicator touches the bottom of the cup. You then close it until the primer ram finds the bottom of the primer pocket, and rotate the scale to line the indicator needle up with zero. This zeros the primer pocket depth against the exact height of the individual primer. You then open it, remove the case, place the exact same primer you just zeroed against into the end of the sleeve around the retracted seating ram, put the case back and press the handle again. This time the ram is priming the case, but because the dial indicator now touches the pedestal, when the dial reads zero the primer's anvil feet are just exactly at the bottom of the pocket. No relying on feel to tell you this. You then press the ram further, watching the dial indicator until you have reached the desired number of thousandths of bridge set. That would be 0.004" with Remington and Olin products. 0.002" with Federal small rifle and 0.003" with Federal large rifle primers (these numbers are recommended by Federal), or 0.003" for military primers (per NOIH numbers of 0.002-0.004" consolidation).
And then there's the Armstrong method. Just seat firmly by feel as consistently as you can.
”There is some debate about how deeply primers should be seated. I don’t pretend to have all the answers about this, but I have experimented with seating primers to different depths and seeing what happens on the chronograph and target paper, and so far I’ve obtained my best results seating them hard, pushing them in past the point where the anvil can be felt hitting the bottom of the pocket. Doing this, I can almost always get velocity standard deviations of less than 10 feet per second, even with magnum cartridges and long-bodied standards on the ’06 case, and I haven’t been able to accomplish that seating primers to lesser depths.”
Dan Hackett
Precision Shooting Reloading Guide, Precision Shooting Inc., Pub. (R.I.P.), Manchester, CT, 1995, p. 271.