Bear:is the9mm enough

This kinda answers the thread with a video test against an actual bears head.

VIDEO:
**9mm extreme penetrator (exact same round OP mentioned) VS an actual REAL Black Bear Head**

https://youtu.be/1Dv5LSsss3U

The test starts at 1:25 mark. Now the only down-side is it was shot on the side, not on the front. But that doesn’t somehow diminish the round the OP mentioned.

“Now as for the damage... Nice holes. No problem passing through. Exit holes are pretty brutal you can see broken bone on the exit holes. Shattered bones no problem penetrating all the way through”.

—just quoting the main part of the video for those who don’t watch it.
 
Also, further proof the 9mm CAN stop a bear (actually the video shows the weaker 9x18 Mak round dropping a Brown Bear). Does it mean you should hunt bear with 9mm? No, of course not. But if someone feels more comfortable carrying a Glock 19 with 16 rounds of 9mm extreme penetrator then looking at all the evidence and tests it seems like it would work, if the shooter does their part (vs someone who say cannot shoot a snub nose sized revolver or similar size revolver - that is a similar sized revolver compared to the mentioned Glock 19 - in 44 mag even half as accurately or confidently as they could shooting a 9mm Glock 19 with 3X + the capacity... Well, I guess I can see why people ask this question and consider it.

***VIDEO: 9x18 drops Brown bear instantly shot multiple times by Police. It was very up close, so they likely landed a shot to the head against the brown bear.***

https://youtu.be/tM2ifggeH0Q

If the 9X18 Mak can down a brown bear (isn’t the 9x18 Mak only slightly more powerful then a 380?) then a 9mm “extreme penetrator” round - which has been tested heavily and shown to penetrate very far, including a test against an actual Bears head - then the 9mm extreme penetrator would obviously work as it’s much hotter round with more pentration.

I think the two videos I linked above answer the “9mm vs a bear” more so than anything else.
 
Last edited:
I would like to point out that it isn't power alone, nor bullet shape when it comes to penetrating a black bear's skull. The angle matters, as well.

Few would argue that a .30-30 doesn't have the power, especially at close range, but I know of a case where several (4) shots deflected off a bear skull at close range. Shot 5 at a slightly different angle penetrated ending the bear.

No matter what you use, sometimes Murphy takes a direct hand, and things that ought to work, don't.
 
I'm not one to argue minor points about bullets, but I can state some of my experiences with them. I shoot a lot of hogs, both in traps and in the woods. Sometimes I use a pistol to finish off one that is already down, and I often shoot them in traps...penetrating the skulls.
I have used most of the common pistol calibers from .22 lr on up through the big bores for this stuff. I often carry a 9mm, 40, or 45 auto with me and use whichever is with me at the time. I have been surprised at the penetration of fmj's in 9mm penetrating as far as it does. I'm usually carrying 115 grain in one and shooting a hog through the forehead, I often find an exit hole through the lower part of the hog..either rear of the rib cage or stomach.
I don't want to necessarily recommend any calibers for bear hunting, but I can say the 9mm fmj does penetrate well.
 
Is 9mm enough? I dunno. But it was designed to knock down 180lb men, not big honking bears.
Click to expand...

What does it matter what the design intent was? Design intent often does not turn out to be the only reality for a product and is often a failure. Viagra was a failed blood pressure medicine. Kevlar was designed with the intent to replace steel inside of tires. Carrier's air conditioner was originally designed as a dehumidifier, not something for cooling purposes. There is ammo out there that is designed for varmint that works very well in much larger game. There is expanding ammo out there that does a poor job of expanding reliably. In the grand scheme, design intent is meaningless. All that matters is how the product actually performs.

I would like to point out that it isn't power alone, nor bullet shape when it comes to penetrating a black bear's skull. The angle matters, as well.

Few would argue that a .30-30 doesn't have the power, especially at close range, but I know of a case where several (4) shots deflected off a bear skull at close range. Shot 5 at a slightly different angle penetrated ending the bear.
Click to expand...

I see and hear of claims of bullets deflecting off of animal skulls all the time, including bears, but the evidence for this actually happening is often lacking. Particularly in the case of bears, what folks often see as the bear head is a LOT of fur surrounding a much smaller actual skull. From what I have seen as examples on YouTube appear to be misses more than deflections or "bounces." Nobody wants to admit they missed.

I made this dotted representation of the bony area (skull and jaw) of a bear relative to fur. As can be seen, the bony area is much smaller than the perceived head size. https://thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=40315&d=1230728059 On top of that, an even much smaller area is brain/brain stem, which are the critical areas that need to be damaged.

Here is a classic video, hog and not bear, where the claim is that the bullets are bouncing off the hog's skull. The guy is actually missing and shooting the ground. However, this sort of claim seems to be typical.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rI0l29YGA-c

Bullets certainly can deflect off of curved surfaces, no doubt. So the potential is real for this happening, but I doubt it happens as commonly as claimed. However, if there is a nice picture of 4 stripes of where bullets literally deflected off the skull (and there would be actual skin and hair removed as a result), that would be super cool to see.
 
Sorry I can't give you any proof, the incident happened back in the 60s, so, no selfie or video, and nearly everyone involved including the bear is long dead now, anyway.

I didn't mean to make it sound like it was a common thing, its uber rare, but like the friend of mine who was hit by the falling duck he shot, it did happen.
 
Anecdotal info from last week.
Went camping 30 miles eat of Yellowstone in Shoshone National forest, noted for a high concentration of grizzlies. Came across about seven guys and one woman fishing in the north fork of the Shoshone river and all were armed with handguns on their sides. Started talking to them and asked what calibers, and all but two were carrying 44 mags, one had a .454 and the other was carrying a SW 500 .50 cal.

And everyone, had a large container of bear spray hanging from their fishing vests.

Just an idea of what the local fishermen/fisherwomen carry when out in bear country standing in very cold running water, just in case.

I was carrying a .40 with 200 gr Buffalo Bore and a can of counter assault bear spray.
 
Went camping 30 miles eat of Yellowstone in Shoshone National forest, noted for a high concentration of grizzlies. Came across about seven guys and one woman fishing in the north fork of the Shoshone river and all were armed with handguns on their sides. Started talking to them and asked what calibers, and all but two were carrying 44 mags, one had a .454 and the other was carrying a SW 500 .50 cal.
Click to expand...

Now that's a well-armed group!
 
Double Naught Spy said:
What does it matter what the design intent was? Design intent often does not turn out to be the only reality for a product and is often a failure...In the grand scheme, design intent is meaningless. All that matters is how the product actually performs.
Click to expand...

I, too, value empirical evidence above most other factors. But sometimes such evidence does not exist or is so rare as to not be reliable.

In any case, design intent matters a whole lot. And it is meaningful. Performance on any particular task is usually a function of design intent, design failures and/or unanticipated uses notwithstanding.

Killing a brown bear with a 9mm pistol is a bit of a fluke and noteworthy and newsworthy. Killing a brown bear with a .375H&H is just another day in Alaska. There is a reason that even a non-gunnys can grasp: The 9x19 pistol was designed to kill humans, the .375H&H rifle designed to kill large dangerous creatures. The implementation of that intent into the design of the .375H&H resulted in greater and/or different resources being brought to bear--in this case ON bear--relative to the 9x19.

Another such fluke would be fishing for Marlin using the same tackle you'd use to fish for bass. The probability for success while using Billy Bob's bass rig versus marlin exists, but using a rig whose design intent included reeling in marlin will most times increase probability of success. IOW, using the right tool designed to do the job at hand matters.

FTR, I have been involved in developing many thingys during my current career. I have also been a user of such thingys in a previous career. I am quite cognizant of both design failures and using a thingy in a way the designers did not anticipate. BTDT.
 
Lehigh has an Xtreme Defender (shallow 15" penetration) and an FMJ amount of penetration in the Xtreme Penetrator.

Two different rounds, both the cross shape, full copper.
 
Is 9mm enough? I dunno. But it was designed to knock down 180lb men, not big honking bears.
Click to expand...

Dude, it doesn't do that reliably even on 150lb men. :rolleyes:

Why would anyone think it's suddenly a 'whopper-stopper' round for use on the big bruins?

Look, the mini-meter serves quite impressively for crowd control at the annual Gay Pride rallies in the greater San Francisco area :rolleyes: but beyond that there are certainly better handgun cartridges for Alaska, or even for the lower 48 when you're going into black-bear country.

:cool:
 
Last edited:
This is all much a-do about nothing. Washington state has 30-40,000 black bears and a smaaaall hand full of griz. Lots and lots of people go to the mountains, lots of people live in the woods with black bears, they are in my neighborhood trash all the time. All of this and there are what, three casss where a bear has killed a person, one was a 4 year old girl.
Between my Wife and I, we have run into dozen pf bear, not ONE stood its ground, pulled out a knife, or even pestered us for a quarter. Not even the 488 pound boar that I ran almost nose to nose with, he took one look at me and went "NOPE" as he dashed off into the brush.

You are much more likely to be killed by yellow jackets, you neighbors dog, a ladder, and let not even get into the ride home in a CAR.

When you compound how much time you are in the woods, with all the noise and smell people make, how skittish bears are and how most will run if even slightly injured the odds are so low of you being mauled or killed....its hardly worth talking about.
If you have a pistol buy some hard cast ammo and hike in confidence, because in reality those other people you encounter are much more dangerous to you.
 
My father was attacked by a grizzly. He had nothing but a fishing rod and won the fight. (It got bored and walked away.) The bear was shot by a ranger later with a .357.

I will carry some weapon in bear country that isn't tourist friendly. Mace, and then a gun. I don't care what the gun is, it's going to be used if I have to, and as god is my witness, I will either live or die. Better to go out shooting and hoping and praying than to drop to the ground and beg for your life.

I won't deliberately choose to carry a nine, that's an open invitation for a losing battle. Maybe a ten mm magnum? I can't carry my twelve gauge with buckshot and slugs.

OTOH, robert redford kicked a big grizzly's butt quite handily with nothing but his bowie knife. I saw him do it on a documentary once when I was a kid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top