% of attacks are RARE. However if you are one of those attacked your odds are 100% and the other stats not much comfort methinks.
Well if something really bad happens to you, you probably don't care about the statistics, you are right. Statistics are not comforting, but for those of us who are not attacked, it should help us to keep things in proper perspective such that we don't take rare and unique news reports and blow them out of importance proportion.
Put another way, based on IHEA data, you are more likely to be shot by another hunter than attacked by a bear and certainly much more likely to be killed by another hunter than killed by a bear.
How rare are they? You are many times more likely to be killed by a hunter (bow, rifle, pistol, or shotgun) than by a bear. You are more likely to be shot by another hunter and survive than be attacked and survive a bear attack.
However, unless you are shot by another hunter in some really unusual circustances, such as having the VP shoot you or you are an avid hiker on a marked hiking trail in a baby blue slicker and shot by an unsupervised 14 year old bear hunter, the incident isn't likely to make national news or capture the the attention of the world.
Yet we have countless threads on defense against bears and the dangers of being attacked by bears when the threat is so much more hype than reality. I guess being concerned about bears is just so much more sexy than being concerned about more common and mundane dangers.