Playboypenguin
Moderator
And you know that how?Look at the list again of those Senators who voted against the bill. This list contains the names most of the rabidly anti-2nd Amendment US Senators in Congress. Where any one of these Senators stands on gun-related issues cannot be questioned......PERIOD! They would have voted against this bill whether "implications" were attached or not.
You are saying you have definitive knowledge of an event that did not happen? The bill was a horrible bill. It was filled with loopholes, vague language, and exemptions that where intentionaly written in to expand the bills meaning way beyond protecting gun manufacturers. The bill would have been used more to protect polluters and companies that violated enviromental and safety laws more than it would have been used to protect gun makers.
How can you say you know who would have voted for it if it was not that way? How can you claim to have knowledge of an event that did not happen?
After reading this bill (and the many legal analysis done of the bill) I would think most people would be more angry with the people who wrote it and the people that voted for it and not the ones that voted against.