ATF Project Gunrunner

During the last hearings I thought "our side" did a poor job of emphasizing how the cartels were really getting their guns.

Conversely Holder's allies consistently harped on lax gun laws as the main supply for the cartels.

This immunity deal sounds like the equivilant of the U.S. Government selling guns to the cartels directly.

I'm thinking that DOJ would rather lose the Vicente Zambada-Niebla case rather than provide the defense with the docs they are asking for. I'm sure the defense knows this and maybe that's their strategy.

I think DOJ knows they can't afford to give documents to Vicente Jesus Zambada-Niebla's defense team that they've with held from Issa and Grasley.
 
This immunity deal sounds like the equivilant of the U.S. Government selling guns to the cartels directly.
Click to expand...
It's still a criminal immunity deal. Some folks will say anything, and throw anybody under the bus, for one of these. I'm going to wait until more comes out before I attach any credibility to a former drug lord turned snitch who's looking for a soft landing.

If his allegations do have credibility, I see a bright future in government service for him, though.
 
In 1990 the Custom s Department intercepted one ton of cocaine entering the U.S. The person bringing it in was a CIA asset who stated he was operating under CIA orders. The CIA admitted that this was true; and "60 Minutes" did an expose on this case wherein the former head of the DEA admitted that the CIA did, indeed, smuggle one ton of cocaine into the U.S.

The reaction was mostly "Ho-hum."
 
The CIA admitted that this was true; and "60 Minutes" did an expose on this case wherein the former head of the DEA admitted that the CIA did, indeed, smuggle one ton of cocaine into the U.S.
Click to expand...
There are significant differences. First, the agency in question knew where the contraband was, and presumably, where it was going. This wasn't the case with the ATF.

Second, the contraband in question was headed in to the United States, where it could be monitored. The ATF was funneling guns out to a foreign nation, after which tracking would be nearly impossible.

Third, there's a difference between drugs and guns. Law enforcement will sometimes let booze, pornography, cigarettes, or whatnot walk with the intention of tracking it further down the line. The exception is guns. It's an unwritten rule that you never, ever let guns walk.
 
I'm not trying to compare apple to oranges. The point was who to believe.

The ones who wish us to believe that they would not participate in such an undertaking have previous history to overcome. They are simply not the first government department to participate in this type of undertaking.
 
It looks like Holder will be testifying again on February 2nd. From Rep. Issa's statement,

The Attorney General will be asked to address management deficiencies within the Department that occurred both during and after the conclusion of Operation Fast and Furious. This will include the Department's steadfast refusal to disclose information following the February 4, 2011 letter to Senator Grassley, which the Department has withdrawn because it contained false information denying allegations made by whistleblowers about Operation Fast and Furious. The committee's investigation has found documentation that numerous members of the Justice Department knew the letter to Congress contained false information both before it was sent and later withdrawn.
Click to expand...
 
And in possibly related news, the NY Times, Daily Mail, and the Mexican magazine Emeequis, are all reporting that the DEA helped a Colombian cocaine supplier named Harold Mauricio Poveda-Ortega launder millions of dollars in an effort to infilitrate cartels working in Mexico. The article even reports that the DEA escorted a shipment of cocaine through Dallas. The article goes on to report that this supplier is estimated to have shipped 150 tons of cocaine to the United States. Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...under-millions-dollars.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

I'm confused at how this law enforcement thing is supposed to be working. I don't understand how laundering millions of dollars of drug money, shipping guns to drug lords, and protecting drug loads as they pass through the United States, is supposed to reduce those activities. It seems to me that federal "sting" operations might be more effective in reducing drug trafficking simply by not funding and continuing the operations they are already involved in.
 
It seems to me that federal "sting" operations might be more effective in reducing drug trafficking simply by not funding and continuing the operations they are already involved in.
Click to expand...
If nothing else, following that line of thinking could potentially reduce the federal deficit quit a bit.
Think about the time and money these operations cost the tax payers.
 
I'm confused at how this law enforcement thing is supposed to be working.
Click to expand...

I am not. These Federal Law Enforcement Beauracracies have forgotten their Sir Robert Peel, #9:

"The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it."

.... they seemed to also have succumbed to ..... Crap! it escapes me - Someone said "There are two types of people in every oraganization. The first is loyal to the original purpose of the organization. The second are loyal to the organization itself. This second group tends to gravitate to management and leadership...." There's a name for it and everything, but I can't seem to find it.....
 
Think about the time and money these operations cost the tax payers.
Click to expand...

I think that many of these organizations raison d'Etre has ceased to be what it was originally set up for, and is now predominantly to provide Government Paychecks...... and be a useful political tool.....
 
C0untZer0 said:
I'm thinking that DOJ would rather lose the Vicente Zambada-Niebla case rather than provide the defense with the docs they are asking for. I'm sure the defense knows this and maybe that's their strategy.

I think DOJ knows they can't afford to give documents to Vicente Jesus Zambada-Niebla's defense team that they've with held from Issa and Grasley.
Click to expand...
Emphasis Mine

If so, it's an absolutely brilliant defense strategy... Not that I'm supportive of the alleged offenses by the defendant in this case, but it is a remarkable strategy.
 
Bartholomew Roberts writes:

"I'm confused at how this law enforcement thing is supposed to be working ..."
------------------------

It might boil down to a question of whom one believes.

Speaking personally, it strikes me that the federal government, under this current administration, has preciious little in the way of credibility. By the way, this is not to say that the one that came before it was much if any better, but that is beside the point.

Now it might be that I'm all wet, I have been so described in other instances. That having been said, I find the present administration lacking. Unfortunately, the current crop of their opponents, The Republicans, do not appear to be particularly encourageing either.
 
Prosecutors ask court to unseal records in Brian Terry case

Washington Times story:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/11/prosecutors-will-ask-for-some-documents-to-be-made/

There is so much here and so much that has already been talked about but I do think that arming those border patrol agents with bean bags and then sending them against killers that BATFE armed with rifles is astounding.

I picture in my mind a scene with DOJ in the middle, the stone-cold killer-narco terrorists and one side and U.S. Border agents on the other side, and DOJ turns to the terrorists and says "Here ya go - you guys can have AK-47s and .50 cal sniper rifles", and then DOJ turns to the Border patrol and says "You guys get bean bags..."


.
 
The article even reports that the DEA escorted a shipment of cocaine through Dallas. The article goes on to report that this supplier is estimated to have shipped 150 tons of cocaine
Click to expand...

That works out to about 1/4 of the annual world wide production. If only they could have worked their way up to one of the "big fish" in the operation instead of dealing with all the small timers.

:rolleyes:
 
Operation White Gun - yet another gun running operation?

LA Times:

Members of Congress want to see whether White Gun, like Fast and Furious, lost track of firearms that ended up with Mexican criminals.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-white-gun-20120113,0,3917291.story

My first question is:

If Obama & Friends were so quick to bring up other gun-running operations like Wide Reciever - why were they quiet about "White Gun" ?


The other thing about this operation is that it failed in acheiving it's stated goals, but it was characterized as an operation that “put a stop to a well-financed criminal conspiracy to acquire massive destructive firepower."



.
 
Last edited:
“put a stop to a well-financed criminal conspiracy to acquire massive destructive firepower."
Click to expand...

I dont think our great fathers :rolleyes: administration will put the brakes on itself but its usually a great reason for promotions all around..
 
Just as Guzman Patino seemed ready to buy, according to the ATF records, the investigation into his activities abruptly ended. The documents do not explain why, and they don't indicate whether he obtained any weapons.
Click to expand...

Interesting part of the LA Times link.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top