For some ideas on this topic......
I suggest you do some reading. The idea of "what will you do when they come for your guns" has been covered extensively in internet forums, and published works. Many books have touched or even concentrated on this subject, from the blatently racist "Turner Diaries" to the technically awesome "Unintended Consequences", and many others.
I for one, would like to suggest that you get a copy of "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross, and read it. Although it is a novel, it does have a lot of factual information in it, along with some very interesting "what if" questions, and potential answers. And you might get a new understanding of why posting a question like this one on an internet forum
might not be such a fine idea.
As for my self, a long time ago I swore an oath to derfend the Constitution if the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And while I still believe in that oath, I never swore to do anything stupid to uphold it.
No US citizen is under any moral compulsion to obey an unconstitutional law. What we must do is accept the consequences of our actions, until an unconstitutional law is delcared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
I obey all current gun laws, even though I do not agree with the restrictions imposed or the reasoning behind them. They are the law, and until changed, should be obeyed.
I do understand the frustrations you feel, and the passion that drives you, because the laws are not just. Yet they are the laws. I have been suffering these unjust laws since 1968, when I first became aware of the impact of gun laws on my personal life. But they are the law. We have, over the years, gotten some of them changed, some restrictions eased. But overall, we have lost far more than we gained. And the reason we have is because we have been complacent, divided, lazy, ignorant, and gullible. AND that no matter what we do or don't do, there are always others who do as they please, defying all the laws that inconvienence them in their pursuit of pleasure. And since they use guns to do that, we suffer for their crimes.
Bad men use guns. = Guns are bad. = Men who have guns are bad. I do believe there is a flaw in that reasoning that any good student could point out. Why do our rulers (and our media) consistantly refuse to see the error?
could it be that they have something to gain by not seeing it?
Looks like a slam dunk to me!