The Tourist
Moderator
bushidomosquito said:I'm not talking about taking up arms against the government.
In effect, yes, we are saying that very thing.
Like it or not, there are legal parameters, separate and distinct from a moral or reasonable framework.
For example, if a guy pumps twelve rounds into a home invader that scared his daughter I can see a father caught up in frightening turn of events that no person should have to face.
I would get the guy counseling. In reality, we all know that our legal system is going to screw this guy, big time. Our government sets the rules and standards for behavior.
Anytime we deviate from those parameters, we have broken the law.
So, this thread asks the question on what our tipping point is for violating those legal standards. Granted, it's more complex than that simple query. There are depths and differences to our respect for the law.
For example, would I break a traffic law? Well, duh, every time I drive.
Would I break laws covering vice? Here the answer is no. Not because I'm a goody-two-shoes, but I don't smoke, drink or gamble. Those ideas don't appeal to me.
How about Wisconsin's silly position on persoanl defense? Here I have proof of my contempt. I was arrested for CCW in 1979. I was carrying a small automatic pistol in my duties as a bill collector.
Tax laws? In this regard the hassle is the determination. Yeah, I believe my government wastes money, but the idea of being an arrogant protester would be worse than the thrill of hostility. I have a tax guy for business and personal taxes. Let him worry.
How far would I go in an attack? Well, I don't really know. If it was some goofy teenage mugger I might simply laugh. Put me even, mano-a-mano, it might even be fun. Life or death, who knows.
My overall point is that our relationship with laws, social mores and personal standards are like layers of an onion. I don't like all bikers, I don't like all gun owners. The decision I face might mean nothing to you.