Are bolt action rifles REALLY more accurate than semi-auto ones?

The benchrest crowd use bolt actions.

As a general rule...a bolt will usually be more accurate. That does not mean they are ALL more accurate. Semi's can be very accurate too. But the differences GENERALLY aren't that great to the average shooter or hunter. It's only when you are trying to squeeze that last little bit of accuracy out that it matters. And to those folks, they weigh their bullets, cases, trim cases just so, neck ream cases, hand weigh each powder charge, use micrometer dies, etc.
 
As a rule the bolt action is going to be easier and cheaper to get super good accuracy from then an AR, but the idea that ARs cannot shoot as well is not true.
Get a copy of "Black Magic" by John Feamster and you'll see how well ARs can shoot.

Just as an example, here is a group I shot at 100 yards about 14 years ago. Now to be honest, the reason I kept this one is that it's the very best group I ever shot in my life with an iron sighted rifle. I cannot do this on demand.
The hole on the lower right was the last sighter. I came up one click and over one click and fired the last 4 rounds.


But the rifle will take a scope and I have scoped it now that I am getting old eyes. It shoots about this well most times with good ammo.
 
Yes, and no..

Art of the rifle has guys hitting steel at 1 mile with both types of guns.

For most mortals, bolt is USUALLY more accurate.

Of course i would like to see more of the semi guys at the range shoot further than 25 yards too.:confused:
 
That is true. Most do only shoot that far with their AR's, but I always see guys with bolt action rifles and high power scopes shooting much further.
 
I just got my AR15 set up to do some longer range shooting. I look forward to putting in the time to tune it up and see how far I can get out. Most of the older gents at the range look down on the "black gun" so I look forward to refining my skills, trying different ammo etc.....
 
If you start to look at *ALL* of the issues that affect accuracy and precision of a rifle, a semi- has multiple additional variables that bolt action rifles don't.
For a couple of rifles that cost roughly the same, an AR-50 that has been accurized by Martin List can shoot 1/4 MOA at 1,000 yards, while a Semi Barrett M107 will shoot 1-1.25 MOA, both with match ammo (and a shooter as good).

You do the math.
 
In contests where the human is eliminated, the stiffer bolt action is the more accurate. However, the Camp Perry National Matches have been won many times by shooters using rifles based around AR15's or AR10's. Having pulled targets with shooters who used the things, a match grade AR10 will shoot half MOA and that is better than I can hold. I won a number of medals in my class with a 223 Spacegun.

Across the course shooting involves standing (200 yards), sitting rapid fire (200 yards), prone rapid fire (300 yards) , and prone slow fire (600 yards). A piece of wisdom I learned was that you win the match standing, and lose it slow fire prone. All the very good shooters clean the rapids, but gas gunners get higher X counts. At long range, the difference between the best shooters is at most a point or two regardless of the rifle they are shooting. However, standing, very few shoot 197's or 198's, or 199's. I scored a HM who shot a 200 at Camp Perry and the guys in the pits cut out his target and gave it to him. Shooting a 200 standing is like a professional pitcher throwing a no hitter.

At 600 yards, I am going to say that wind reading abilities are more important than whether the action is a bolt gun or a gas gun. You get the wind wrong and your bullet drifts out in distances that are best measures in yards.

Owning the most accurate rifle in the world does not mean the owner can hit the broad side of barn, even if the shooter is inside the barn. Shooting is a skill and it takes practice to get good at it.
 
"Back in the day" that was more true than it is now. Being an engineer I'll tell you this, the less moving parts the better and generally speaking a bolt gun is a more simple mechanism than a semi. Therefore it is inherently harder to screw up in manufacturing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
For bench rest and all long range competitive shooting, lots of things come into play that hunters and recreational shooters would never consider. A bolt action, particularly a short action, tends to be stiffer and the action, bolt and barrel (since it's not removeable) can be trued to a fine degree. that can be sone in an AR rifle, but it's probably a bit more complicated. Trigger lock time in either case as well as lack of slack/creep/overtravel can be good in both. Finally the barrel and the handloads are probably more important than the action type. My two cents.
 
As has been said, the short answer is that yes, bolt action, all things equal, will be more accurate. When the bolt slams forward on a gasser, it has the potential to set the bullet back a bit AND set the shoulder back a bit. With long range loads IBR shooters, and to a lesser extent me who shoots 1k F-CLASS, take great pains to ensure a consistent case dimension and cartridge base to bullet ogive. At 1k yards a 0.002 bullet setback in my comp gun could change POI by 1/2" or more. Couple that with a smaller case volume due to shoulder setback and it compounds.

Then, if the bullets are deformed in anyway when being violently stripped off the mag, that would make matters worse. IBR and a couple guys I have been shooting with will uniform the bullet tips which would be undone by such violence when chambering.

Finally, there is the trigger....I don't know about you, but I wouldn't put a 4oz trigger on a semi-auto.

Don't get me wrong, AR's can be very accurate. I have a 1/2" moa load in my Gas piston 20" Varmint barrel AR that I shot an F-TR match with, 562-18x. And my AR 10 Ruger SR 762 is 1/2-3/4 moa with my Federal GMM cloan hand load.

But my F-CLASS rifle shoots 3/4-1" groups at 300 yards, all day, every day, no fliers..and I don't mean that is the best it will do, I mean that is what it does at worst on a calm day. Not gonna happen in either of my high dollar AR's.
 
Last edited:
It is possible to make a semi-auto pretty accurate, they can be close, but all things being equal the bolt gun wins. IF you throw enough money at it. You can buy a $400 bolt gun that will outshoot a $4000 semi-auto.

There is also the ammo issue. Semi-autos need ammo that operates within a narrow range of pressure in order for the rifle to function. Ammo for bolt guns can be loaded to much broader ranges from very light to loads very hot loads that would never work in a semi-auto. Depending on the desired outcome sometimes very light loads may prove to be the most accurate, and for extreme ranges sometimes hotter loads are necessary.
 
Mississippi noted
Finally, there is the trigger....I don't know about you, but I wouldn't put a 4oz trigger on a semi-auto.
Click to expand...

Uh yea, that's effectively a Class III weapon, and from a safety point the reason that Barrett's, Serbu BFG's, and other semi-.50's have 8 lb+ triggers out of the factory.
With the large recoil motion on High power rifles, emptying the mag would almost be a guarantee with a 4 oz (or 1.5 oz in a few cases) .50 cal trigger.
 
It really depends on your qualifier for accuracy. An AM is not likely to beat a Winchester Model 70 (note the qualifier likely) but there are accurate semi autos. Bolt actions are far easier to make consistently accurate and with fewer trade offs to balance (recoil, weight, magazine capacity, portability etc) as far as design purposes and engineering go.

One should consider the intended use for the question
 
Which bolt action against which semi auto?
My BREN 805 will out shoot my old Mosin Nagant M38 any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
My CZ 527M/CSR will leave my wife's old Mini-14 in the dust at any range.
 
It is possible to make a semi-auto pretty accurate, they can be close, but all things being equal the bolt gun wins. IF you throw enough money at it. You can buy a $400 bolt gun that will outshoot a $4000 semi-auto.
Click to expand...

This quote really sums it up. As I said, I have a Varmint AR that will usually hold 1/2 MOA, but I have about $3,000 into that gun/scope/trigger etc. My wife's hunting rifle is a Ruger American .270 win, $350 out the door...every single combo of bullets and powder I have tried in that gun are sub MOA and the load she uses now, Just cheap Hornady 130gr SST's and H4831 shoots bugholes at 100 yards.

So, sure, AR's can be accurate...because Sub MOA is accurate in my opinion. But if you compare costs, vs absolute group size, vs the amount of time and effort to get your semi-auto accurate...you will be miles ahead using a bolt action. Thats really it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top