Anybody here voting for Gore?
- Thread starter WETSU
- Start date
walangkatapat
New member
EricM, Hope you're right Eric.
------------------
"Gun Control is Only to Protect Those in Power"
------------------
"Gun Control is Only to Protect Those in Power"
walangkatapat
New member
David Scott, Sorry David, but your balance of power is wrong, not right. What parties controlled the House and Senate for the first two years of Clinton? What party controlled the House for forty straight years? It doesn't add up, does it?
------------------
"Gun Control is Only to Protect Those in Power"
------------------
"Gun Control is Only to Protect Those in Power"
I don't think "ballance" is a valid reason to vote for gore. Congress is way overloaded with power hungry, bleeding heart, one worlder UN worshipers. Republican and Democrate alike.
I vote for Bush because he is slightly less odious than Algore. The rest of the ballot I will vote for the more constitutional regardless of party.
------------------
Sam I am, grn egs n packin
Nikita Khrushchev predicted confidently in a speech in Bucharest, Rumania on June 19, 1962 that: " The United States will eventually fly the Communist Red Flag...the American people will hoist it themselves."
I vote for Bush because he is slightly less odious than Algore. The rest of the ballot I will vote for the more constitutional regardless of party.
------------------
Sam I am, grn egs n packin
Nikita Khrushchev predicted confidently in a speech in Bucharest, Rumania on June 19, 1962 that: " The United States will eventually fly the Communist Red Flag...the American people will hoist it themselves."
C'mon!! This is easy! I'm voting Bush, but I have a much tougher decision to make. I'm in PRNYS. If I vote Lazio, he's almost as bad as mrs. Klinton! If I vote Libertarian, I'm voting my conscience. I hope I find a job in a free state so I can leave this occupied territory!
------------------
The first step is registration, the second step is confiscation, the final step is subjugation.
------------------
The first step is registration, the second step is confiscation, the final step is subjugation.
I voted two days after my card got here. Which I might add...took me 4 months to get. I applied for it 2x at the DMV, then I sent in a vote reg to them then a sexond and a phone call telling them I was voting like it or not so they may as well send my damn card and make it easy and un-newsworthy.
I voted straight Libertarian but penned in Bush.
I voted straight Libertarian but penned in Bush.
To quote an old Ray Charles tune, "Tell your maw, tell your paw! I'm gonna send Klinton's ass back to Arkansas"; and Ghore's
back to the green, green grass of home!!!
I hate to admit that the Ghore scum-bag is from the great state of Tennessee!!!
Regards,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
back to the green, green grass of home!!!
I hate to admit that the Ghore scum-bag is from the great state of Tennessee!!!
Regards,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
responses to various above:
GWB is NOT his daddy. He is closer, in ideology and brass to do the job, to Reagan than his dad ever was.
The "balance" strategy is fundamentally flawed. The reason is simple. While we are over here arguing the constitutional imperatives for balance in houses, blah, blah blah - there are millions of sheep pulling the lever straight down the Democrat party line. You know what kind of "balance" that gets you ? Forty years of Dem control, as someone else pointed out.
I live in NJ, where socialist universalist Jon Corzine (the NY Times says he's left of EVERY other member of the senate) has spent more on his senate campaign than GWB has for President. I would sooner vote for the gum on my shoe than vote for Corzine or Gore.
------------------
Act as free men, and do not use your freedom as a covering for evil, but use it as bondslaves of God.
1 Peter 2:16.
GWB is NOT his daddy. He is closer, in ideology and brass to do the job, to Reagan than his dad ever was.
The "balance" strategy is fundamentally flawed. The reason is simple. While we are over here arguing the constitutional imperatives for balance in houses, blah, blah blah - there are millions of sheep pulling the lever straight down the Democrat party line. You know what kind of "balance" that gets you ? Forty years of Dem control, as someone else pointed out.
I live in NJ, where socialist universalist Jon Corzine (the NY Times says he's left of EVERY other member of the senate) has spent more on his senate campaign than GWB has for President. I would sooner vote for the gum on my shoe than vote for Corzine or Gore.
------------------
Act as free men, and do not use your freedom as a covering for evil, but use it as bondslaves of God.
1 Peter 2:16.
Tom Matiska
New member
Ten years ago I could have easily voted for SENATOR Gore from Tennessee. I don't who this guy is who has been using his name the past 8 years, but no way I could vote for him.
The fact the race is so close in is home state speaks volumes.
Tom
The fact the race is so close in is home state speaks volumes.
Tom
David Scott
New member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by buzz_knox:
I read your reasons, David. Your reasoning is in accord with what political scientists call "split level realignment." People vote one party for president and another for Congress. Unfortunately, I think it's a bogus theory.[/quote]
Fortunately, I don't.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Gore can get left-wingers as judges by bringing the full weight of the media and the ABA against Congress, particularly if he appoints judges who are "politically immune" from criticism (i.e. minority, female, handicapped). [/quote]
So what it amounts to is that you have no faith in the Republicans in Congress to stand their ground, because they fear the media? Doesn't that go back to my contention that all politicians are mostly concerned with their own welfare and that of their financial supporters?
By the way, what has the American Basketball Association to do with Supreme Court justices?
(I always thought the Bar Association was a drinking club.)
I read your reasons, David. Your reasoning is in accord with what political scientists call "split level realignment." People vote one party for president and another for Congress. Unfortunately, I think it's a bogus theory.[/quote]
Fortunately, I don't.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Gore can get left-wingers as judges by bringing the full weight of the media and the ABA against Congress, particularly if he appoints judges who are "politically immune" from criticism (i.e. minority, female, handicapped). [/quote]
So what it amounts to is that you have no faith in the Republicans in Congress to stand their ground, because they fear the media? Doesn't that go back to my contention that all politicians are mostly concerned with their own welfare and that of their financial supporters?
By the way, what has the American Basketball Association to do with Supreme Court justices?
(I always thought the Bar Association was a drinking club.)Don Quixote
New member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by David Scott:
So what it amounts to is that you have no faith in the Republicans in Congress to stand their ground, because they fear the media? [/quote]
That's absolutely my view. Seen it time and time again. Vote for all Repubs--they're going to need both the congress and the White House to have a chance of developing any spine.
Unfortunately, we can't vote out the media.
So what it amounts to is that you have no faith in the Republicans in Congress to stand their ground, because they fear the media? [/quote]
That's absolutely my view. Seen it time and time again. Vote for all Repubs--they're going to need both the congress and the White House to have a chance of developing any spine.
Unfortunately, we can't vote out the media.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Gary H:
Hey, it's a semi-free country. You get what you deserve. The truth is that voting for Bush is voting for the lesser evil. It's not like Bush is really going to drastically reduce the size of government, or push strict interpretation of the Second. There are serious character questions that reflect poorly upon those that elect Democrats. Democrats, in the recent past, have used victim psychology, class warfare, age warfare, fear mongering, lies and distortions. Do Republicans ever partake of these techniques? I think that they do, but it is with less regularity. I hear Democrats excuse themselves by saying that all politicians are the same. I disagree, in that they differ as to degree. I now view Democrats, the electorate, with a distrusting eye. You have got to believe that they use these same standards in their own lives. Beware..they will lie for advantage.[/quote]
bush is the only one that will get gore out and if anyone thinks there is no difference between bush and gore ..... well, I guess we'll find out how bad things will really get , if gore wins this election...
Hey, it's a semi-free country. You get what you deserve. The truth is that voting for Bush is voting for the lesser evil. It's not like Bush is really going to drastically reduce the size of government, or push strict interpretation of the Second. There are serious character questions that reflect poorly upon those that elect Democrats. Democrats, in the recent past, have used victim psychology, class warfare, age warfare, fear mongering, lies and distortions. Do Republicans ever partake of these techniques? I think that they do, but it is with less regularity. I hear Democrats excuse themselves by saying that all politicians are the same. I disagree, in that they differ as to degree. I now view Democrats, the electorate, with a distrusting eye. You have got to believe that they use these same standards in their own lives. Beware..they will lie for advantage.[/quote]
bush is the only one that will get gore out and if anyone thinks there is no difference between bush and gore ..... well, I guess we'll find out how bad things will really get , if gore wins this election...