shouldazagged
New member
It's like taking away Indy's hat and whip, or making Bonds new drink of choice a Mai Tai.
The horror!
It's like taking away Indy's hat and whip, or making Bonds new drink of choice a Mai Tai.
Easily.Dragline45 said:How can you not be a fan of Sir Roger Moore?
Brosnan was a big improvement over Moore, but still not as true to the Bond of Ian Fleming as I had hoped when he was announced for the role.
Don't forget, many promotional photos of Sean Connery's James Bond used a Walther BB gun.
The Walther PPK .380acp is played out.
James Bond was deadly. Roger Moore played him like a lightweight comedian. There was nothing deadly about Roger Moore's Bond. Brosnan was a big improvement over Moore, but still not as true to the Bond of Ian Fleming as I had hoped when he was announced for the role.
The stunts and gadgets and SFX are indeed what the Bond films are about today, and that's why I don't bother to watch the new Bond films.ClydeFrog said:Gadgets & SFX are cool . Sam Mendes(the Skyfall dir) put a lot into the film but weapons & SFX & stunts & hot women are what 007 films are all about.
Moore was born in London, Connery is a Scot. Both are "British," and I would say that Bond as portrayed by Connery was certainly distinctively British. He sure enough would never be taken for an American.simonrichter said:On account of Moore is to say that at least he had some distinctive Britishness, something I didn't see too much in neither Connery nor Craig.