dgludwig said:I like to be able to adjust my sights to accommodate different bullet weights and/or powder loadings in terms of meshing point of aim (poa) with point of impact (poi).
I've never grasped why someone wouldn't want adjustable sights!
I don't want adjustable sights on any defensive handgun, especially one I carry. There's always the chance that they can be knocked out of whack, whereas fixed sights are much more durable.hatchettjack said:I've never grasped why someone wouldn't want adjustable sights!
For sure, and so I'll emphasize that I'm only referring to my defensive handguns here.44 AMP said:And also remember that while we do focus on it heavily here, there IS more to the world of pistol shooting than duty guns and defensive shooting.
I much prefer the sight picture of fixed handgun sights like the Trijicon HDs. But that's only for defensive handguns; I would rather have adjustable target sights for a non-defensive handgun.44 AMP said:I vastly prefer adjustable sights on any and everything I can get them on. Often they provide a better sight picture than the fixed versions.
I used to carry a 1911 with adjustable sights. During one range session I started off doing rapid fire holster drills at very short range. Then I moved the target out to 25 yards and all of a sudden I was shooting 3 feet high; I even managed to shoot the target off its PVC hanger. It was pretty embarrassing.44 AMP said:The "fragile" comes from the late 19th and early 20th century sights, and really does not apply to what is used today. If you don't use the back sight to drive nails with, it usually doesn't have issues.
...There are NO sights better than fixed sights IF they're fixed in the right place !! AND getting them there is NO big deal atall.