Just one of the many of the nits I pick...
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and [/u]among[/u] the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To regulate commerce among the states is a bit different than regulating commerce with the states. If words are to mean anything, then there was a reason the founders choose the preposition "among" over the preposition "with," as they did as regards foreign nations and indian tribes.
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and [/u]among[/u] the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To regulate commerce among the states is a bit different than regulating commerce with the states. If words are to mean anything, then there was a reason the founders choose the preposition "among" over the preposition "with," as they did as regards foreign nations and indian tribes.
So, yeah. I'm at odds with the Courts (and the Congress) and how they've interpreted that clause."For a like reason, I made no reference to the "power to regulate commerce among the several States." I always foresaw that difficulties might be started in relation to that power which could not be fully explained without recurring to views of it, which, however just, might give birth to specious though unsound objections. Being in the same terms with the power over foreign commerce, the same extent, if taken literally, would belong to it. Yet it is very certain that it grew out of the abuse of the power by the importing States in taxing the non-importing, and was intended as a negative and preventive provision against injustice among the States themselves, rather than as a power to be used for the positive purposes of the General Government, in which alone, however, the remedial power could be lodged." James Madison to Joseph C. Cabell, Letters 4:14--15, 13 Feb. 1829