Seems to me like you'd be better served to figure out just what it is you do want before you worry about who (if any) is best suited to deliver it.If he were to somehow get the nomination and win the election; I'm not sure I want a four year stalemate any more than I want four years of Hillary or Rudy.
Seems to me like you'd be better served to figure out just what it is you do want before you worry about who (if any) is best suited to deliver it.
Pubulis,
The comment you mentioned wasn't intended as a flame, it's simply an observation. When I ask about accomplishments and support from colleagues I continually get "He got principles." and "He's libertarian" The funny thing is when I have mentioned his libertarian connections I've been chastised and been told he's republican and has never been a libertarian. That tells me that many who are following him are doing so without knowing much about him. In other words blindly following. The veracity of his following IMO boarders on cult like behavior. Like I said, I would like to support him, I just don't know why I should and with few exceptions(GS) nobody can tell me a sound reason to support him. If he were to somehow get the nomination and win the election; I'm not sure I want a four year stalemate any more than I want four years of Hillary or Rudy.
Seems to me like you'd be better served to figure out just what it is you do want before you worry about who (if any) is best suited to deliver it.
As for me, I'm quite comfortable with a 4 year stalemate. Seems to me that every time Washington "accomplishes" something it's bad news.
I was liking him better before I saw this; he voted no in nearly every military/DOD/VA/homeland security appropriation bill. That hits me in my livelihood.
Ron Paul has voted more consistently than many others on a strict interpretation of the Constitution.
"Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country."-Ronald ReaganIt also demonstrates Ron Paul's lack of support for our military and for our national security
If you can explain why Ron Paul voted against the Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, and how his anti-gun vote makes him the most "constitutional", please, educate us.
If you can explain why Ron Paul voted against the Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, and how his anti-gun vote makes him the most "constitutional", please, educate us.