A question to the members

How can you trust a government that wants to deny its law-abiding citizens the right to the same firearms that it supplies to Mexican drug cartels? I am not in favor of any government infringement of my God given rights. I believe "government involvement" and "botched" to be nearly synonymous terms. Rant over.
 
Last edited:
Would you support legislation that requires all firearms transactions to go through a FFL?

Yes, I would, in exchange for all the following:

-Extend and enhance definition of “continuous travel” to provide real protection for interstate travel by land, sea, and air
-Repeal bans for trains and buses.
-Repeal bans in post office, VA facilities, park buildings, and all other similar federal facilities and grounds
-Repeal Gun Free School Zones Act
-Allow concealed carry in any establishment that is tax-exempt or receives federal funding (and that is a BUNCH of places).
-Complete protection from law suits after a legal use of a weapon.
-National reciprocity
-Blanket pardon for anyone convicted on a charge coming out of the above repealed laws

That would be a worthwhile net gain.
 
That would be a worthwhile net gain.
While it lasts. Say we make that "trade," and a couple of years down the road, there's a similar tragedy. Then the Gun Free School Zone gets re-enacted. Perhaps the political climate changes, and we see restrictions on carry reinstated.

The net result for us would be a loss, and we'd be worse off than before.
 
How can you trust a government that wants to deny its law-abiding citizens the right to the same firearms that it supplies to Mexican drus cartels? I am not in favor of any government infringement of my God given rights. I believe "government involvement" and "botched" to be nearly synonymous terms.

Bingo!!!

NO!!!!NEVER WAKE UP PEOPLE Think Camel in the tent

This: Its about control and the elimination of guns from US society.
 
Back
Top