I can't believe they're actually using these statutes to justify their actions.
I don't think they are , They are just showing laws that were implemented . I can't for a second think they will actually use those as precedent in there briefs as favorable to there argument , although I hope they do .
What I am seeing as I read through this spreadsheet. Is that there is a clear precedent without repeal or challenges of many Second Amendment restrictions . No it doesn’t appear that there are any that seem to be nationwide but there is clear evidence that just about every state did some sort of restrictions . That seems like a clear tradition to me especially for those of us that believe states have sovereignty over their own territory .
I’ve only read through 12 pages so far so I could be wrong but there definitely seems to be a pattern here . To be honest I'm a bit surprised how many of those laws were not repealed or challenged at all . Is that to mean they are all still good law now ? Or has the state left out other laws that make those irrelevant ?
Last edited: