Formal order submitted
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Roger T. Benitez: Status Conference held on 12/12/2022. The state defendants shall create, and the plaintiffs shall meet and confer regarding, a survey or spreadsheet of relevant statutes, laws, or regulations in chronological order.
The listing shall begin at the time of the adoption of the Second Amendment and continue through twenty years after the Fourteenth Amendment.
For each cited statute/law/regulation, the survey shall provide:
(a) the date of enactment;
(b) the enacting state, territory, or locality;
(c) a description of what was restricted (e.g., dirks, daggers, metal knuckles, storage of gunpowder or cartridges, or use regulations);
(d) what it was that the law or regulation restricted;
(e) what type of weapon was being restricted (e.g., knife, Bowie Knife, stiletto, metal knuckles, pistols, rifles);
(f) if and when the law was repealed and whether it was replaced;
(g) whether the regulation was reviewed by a court and the outcome of the courts review (with case citation).
Defendants may create a second survey covering a time period following that of the first list. If opposing parties cannot agree on the inclusion of a particular entry on the survey, the disagreement shall be indicated and described on a separate list.
The survey list shall be filed within 30 days.
Parties may file a brief up to 25 pages within 30 days thereafter focusing on relevant analogs.
Parties may file a responsive brief within 10 days thereafter.
Parties shall agree within 20 days on deposing Mr. Roth and Mr. Cramer at an agreed place and time.
(Court Reporter/ECR Abigail Torres). (Plaintiff Attorney John W. Dillon). (Defendant Attorney Kevin J. Kelly, Mark R. Beckington). (no document attached) (gxr). (Entered: 12/15/2022)
Looks like they want them all in 30 days , wow that seems like a big ask to me .
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Roger T. Benitez: Status Conference held on 12/12/2022. The state defendants shall create, and the plaintiffs shall meet and confer regarding, a survey or spreadsheet of relevant statutes, laws, or regulations in chronological order.
The listing shall begin at the time of the adoption of the Second Amendment and continue through twenty years after the Fourteenth Amendment.
For each cited statute/law/regulation, the survey shall provide:
(a) the date of enactment;
(b) the enacting state, territory, or locality;
(c) a description of what was restricted (e.g., dirks, daggers, metal knuckles, storage of gunpowder or cartridges, or use regulations);
(d) what it was that the law or regulation restricted;
(e) what type of weapon was being restricted (e.g., knife, Bowie Knife, stiletto, metal knuckles, pistols, rifles);
(f) if and when the law was repealed and whether it was replaced;
(g) whether the regulation was reviewed by a court and the outcome of the courts review (with case citation).
Defendants may create a second survey covering a time period following that of the first list. If opposing parties cannot agree on the inclusion of a particular entry on the survey, the disagreement shall be indicated and described on a separate list.
The survey list shall be filed within 30 days.
Parties may file a brief up to 25 pages within 30 days thereafter focusing on relevant analogs.
Parties may file a responsive brief within 10 days thereafter.
Parties shall agree within 20 days on deposing Mr. Roth and Mr. Cramer at an agreed place and time.
(Court Reporter/ECR Abigail Torres). (Plaintiff Attorney John W. Dillon). (Defendant Attorney Kevin J. Kelly, Mark R. Beckington). (no document attached) (gxr). (Entered: 12/15/2022)
Looks like they want them all in 30 days , wow that seems like a big ask to me .
Last edited: