.357 magnum 125 grain vs 158

Super-Dave

New member
Why is the 125 grain considered more effective for self defense than the 158 grain?

Did the 158 grain not reliably mushroom?
 
For .357 magnum, a 125 gr. bullet at 1600 fps carries ~5% more kinetic energy than a 158 gr. bullet at 1400 fps and might be slightly easier to open, although there's plenty of force to open either. It's likely splitting hairs, either is more than enough for SD. For practice, the lighter bullet also is reported to cause more top strap erosion than the heavier one.

For .38 special, I prefer the heavier bullet, they lose less velocity in the shorter barreled snubs than the lighter bullets do.
 
Last edited:
The 125grn semi-jacketed loadings from Remington and Federal scored the highest (96%) in the Marshall-Sanow study and that is likely where much of their legendary reputation comes from. If you look at the paper ballistics, you will see that the typical 125grn loading at 1400-1500fps will have a slight kinetice energy advantage (usually about 50 ft. lbs.) over the typical 158grn loading at 1200-1300fps.

In the real world, the 125grn loadings seem to expand more aggressively while the 158grn loadings seem to penetrate more deeply. Both have plenty of velocity to ensure reliable expansion with a properly designed bullet. I can tell you from my own testing that both Remington's 158grn SJHP and Winchester's 145grn Silvertip will expand quite well in both wetpack and even dry paper.

Really, I agree with spacecoast that it's splitting hairs. I, personally, prefer the 158grn loadings because I find their blast to be less offensive and because they are much kinder to the forcing cone of my S&W K-Frame. I'm not particularly worried about overpenetration because nearly every major caliber handgun can overpenetrate under the right circumstances.
 
I find it negligent to be dismissive of the over-penetration qualities of the 158gr. bullet. Research will prove this out. None of the major defensive calibers penetrate as much. It is usually recommended for large game because of this. Better to use 125gr. or even 140-146gr. for self defense.
 
Super-Dave said:
Why is the 125 grain considered more effective for self defense than the 158 grain?

Did the 158 grain not reliably mushroom?

It is possible that given the state of bullet technology, back when the .357 Magnum was the predominate LE cartridge; that some 158 grain projectiles did not expand as well. Today the difference in expansion between the 158 and 125 grain projectiles of any of the makers is probably close to nil.


Lets look at some testing from the past.

.357 Magnum Ammunition Performance Data

.357 Magnum 125 grain Federal JHP, tested 7/27/90 by the FBI

Test Gun: S&W Model 13 3" barrel

Velocity: 1265 fps

Clothed Gelatin Penetration: 11.75 in Expansion: .51"


.357 Magnum 158 grain Federal JHP, tested 2/28/91 by the FBI


Test Gun: S&W M19 4" barrel

Velocity: 1200 fps

Clothed Gelatin Penetration: 15.90" Expansion: .64"


Even with a 4 inch barrel for the 125 and 3 inch for the 158 the results would not be much different. Either one striking in the same location, would do about the same amount of damage.

If you are anyone still wants to put creedence in the 'One shot stop' data. Just consider a few simple facts, it is all derived from a single shot to the torso. No thought is given to what vital organs, structures or blood bearing vessels might have been hit.

Also where are the statistics of those shot twice or more?

Lastly, consider that the .357 was the predominate LE cartridge at one time. That fact means that most of the .357 shootings recorded were done by trained LE personnel in the line of duty. Most of those shootings occurred at night and at a distance of less than two yards.

Hum, lets see. A trained LE officer shoots someone COM @ 2 yards or less with a loud, large muzzle flash producing revolver. A revolver that also shoots a projectile that penetrates 12 plus inches and expands to .50+ caliber. That person then stops, gee I wonder why?

So the .357 is a good defense pistol, I like them. In fact I own four of them. However they are not magic, or somehow super superior to a .45 ACP, .40 S&W, 9 mm, etc, etc. As long as any of them penetrate from 12-18 inches and expand at least one and one half times their diameter, they will perform just as well.

PS: I did not write this to sell a book. Only to help turn back the tides of ignorance.
 
Water-Man said:
I find it negligent to be dismissive of the over-penetration qualities of the 158gr. bullet. Research will prove this out.

Well, since you are so adamant in your beliefs. Then you could support your argument by posting links to evidence of over penetration.

While you are at it you might want to do a search on 'the over penetration myth' before you do.
 
I find it negligent to be dismissive of the over-penetration qualities of the 158gr. bullet. Research will prove this out. None of the major defensive calibers penetrate as much. It is usually recommended for large game because of this. Better to use 125gr. or even 140-146gr. for self defense.

The vast majority of premium JHP ammo made these days is engineered to meet the FBI's penetration standards of 12-16". 12" would be completely through the upper torso of all but the largest of individuals assuming a straight-on frontal shot, much less a shot to an extremity. Because of this, nearly any loading suitable for self-defense has the ability to overpenetrate under the right conditions. For this reason, I simply assume that any bullet I fire will overpenetrate and adjust my tactics accordingly. Remember, be sure of your target and what is beyond it. Personally, I find it irresponsible to assume that you're immune from overpenetration through your choice of ammunition.
 
People are HUGE nowadays. A 125 grain bullet may not reach a vital area, or penetrate a car or other barrier.
When I was growing up, 300 pound people were only seen at freak shows, now it's not that uncommon. A while back (last year, I think,) we had a 300 pound druggy go ape-stuff in Charleston; he smashed through a glass door, charged the cops, was tazered, but nothing worked. It was all caught on video, and it was scary. I think the LEs finally just shot him.
For self-defense, I'm sticking with 158 grain, or even heavier in the winter, when people are wearing heavy clothes. Sorry - I'm not going to risk getting killed from the guy in front of me over fears of the person who may be behind him.
 
WVfishguy said:
A 125 grain bullet may not reach a vital area, or penetrate a car or other barrier.

Changing the subject a little bit, but I see comments like the one above often and I have some trouble with it. I have trouble imagining the need to penetrate cars or other barriers in a self defense situation. I understand WVFG may have been talking about law enforcement needs for handgun ammo, but are there any instances where the ability to penetrate a barrier is needed for self defense?
 
I like 158 grain 357s... I use them out of my Carbine for Deer all the time.

I think for self defense the smaller grains are better. I know when I tried to shoot 158 grain rounds from my S&W 640 it really hurt. That said when people ask me what they should shoot I tell them what they feel confident with. Id rather trust my life to a guy with a 22 that knew how to use it than a guy with a 44mag that has never fired a gun.
 
Water-Man said:
I find it negligent to be dismissive of the over-penetration qualities of the 158gr. bullet. Research will prove this out. None of the major defensive calibers penetrate as much. It is usually recommended for large game because of this. Better to use 125gr. or even 140-146gr. for self defense.

Just because a bullet exits through the body doesn't necessarily mean it's overpenetration for one's preference of a SD load. The "research" that you seem to take to gospel that defines overpenetration doesn't mean it's the same parameters for others.
 
Originally posted by Sport45
Quote:
Originally Posted by WVfishguy
A 125 grain bullet may not reach a vital area, or penetrate a car or other barrier.
Changing the subject a little bit, but I see comments like the one above often and I have some trouble with it. I have trouble imagining the need to penetrate cars or other barriers in a self defense situation. I understand WVFG may have been talking about law enforcement needs for handgun ammo, but are there any instances where the ability to penetrate a barrier is needed for self defense?

The most realistic scenario in which I can see an average person needing barrier-penetration capability would be a carjacking and/or road rage incident. I could see the need to shoot through a car door if you were attacked in heavy traffic and were thusly unable to escape.

Somewhat less likely, but still possible, would be the need to shoot through a door. While such a tactic isn't generally wise, it does have merit in certain circumstances. If, for instance, you have barricaded yourself and/or your loved ones into a room of your home and an intruder is actively attempting to break down the door, shooting through the door could be a viable option.
 
Nate45...Since you're the one refuting what I'm saying then you should be doing the research to learn what you obviously don't know.
 
I'm not real worried about 158's over penetrating..... I put 4 158 XTP's into a 1 1/2 y.o. buck at 5 yards. Even at 1250 f/sec, none went out the far side.
 
I used to carry 125 grain, buying into the silly notion that a 158 grain would "over-penetrate" I'm more worried about a missed shot hitting a bystander than I am about a fully expanded round that just exited the bad guy causing damage. Statistically speaking, a missed shot (with ALL it's energy) is more likely to hit/injure an innocent.

After treating patients at one of commifornia's finest prisons, I upgraded to the 158 grain. I want to be able to have a good chance at hitting something vital even if I have to shoot him through the butt to hit something vital.
 
I would not want to have to eh-splain to da jury why I had to do a texas heart shot to defend myself...

...that said, I would want all the penetration possible if I ran up against a Fat Bastard (from the Austin Powers movies) look alike.....
 
penetrate??????

Just to muddy the water.

Isn't the .357 pretty much accepted as being created to increase penetration on auto bodies and steel vests, as utilized by the auto bandits of the late 20's and 30's??

Now, that was with SWC or RN I guess, maybe even some type of FMJ or AP bullet.
Seems like they gave a special Reg. Mag to old Hoover himself.

Counting on a hollow point, from a handgun of any cal or bullet weight to expand in a gunfight and human torso is a roll of the dice, whether you need that expansion v. penetration, is THE question.
 
Originally posted by Water-Man
Nate45...Since you're the one refuting what I'm saying then you should be doing the research to learn what you obviously don't know.

Webleymkv...Keep coming up with your fantasy scenarios and you might even convince yourself.

Well Water-Man, since you made the claim that 158grn bullets are overly penetrative, why don't you provide us with some documented cases of innocent bystanders being injured or killed by overpenetrating 158grn .357 JHP's. After all, you made the original claim so the burden of proof is on you.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top