Tennessee Gentleman
New member
Man, I thought this thread was done. Well let me answer a few final comments.
Because you are equating an extreme, evil and pernicious institution with the regulation of full auto weapons. I find the comparison offensive at worst, very poor thinking at best.
We addressed them but you don't like the answers we gave . Too bad. I and most other gun owners I believe (and I think the NRA) will never support the public having an unrestricted right to military weapons. I don't think the courts or legislatures will follow as well.
I think to continue debating any more would be circular but continue on if it pleases you.
What's appaling or offensive about it?
Because you are equating an extreme, evil and pernicious institution with the regulation of full auto weapons. I find the comparison offensive at worst, very poor thinking at best.
Unfortunately, there were several points that myself and others brought up which Tennessee Gentleman and Yukon Kid refused to address.
We addressed them but you don't like the answers we gave . Too bad. I and most other gun owners I believe (and I think the NRA) will never support the public having an unrestricted right to military weapons. I don't think the courts or legislatures will follow as well.
I think to continue debating any more would be circular but continue on if it pleases you.