waudcutter
New member
Yes. I've shots lots of deer and antelope on the plains with a .243 and it works fine.
Simple answer.......NO
Excerpts from “Return to Reason” from the May 2008 issue of Shooting Times.
By Greg Rodriguez
...
I take note of caliber, bullet, shot distance, shot placement, and the distance each animal runs after the shot. Over the last three seasons, hunters on one of the ranches I run took 92 deer and 27 hogs. Of those my tracking dog ran down 21 deer and 8 hogs. Two hogs and four deer were never recovered....
Further digging revealed that all but four of the animals that had to be tracked more than 50 yards were shot with magnum rifles. All but one animal that was wounded and lost were shot with a magnum of some sort.
That revelation inspired me to go back a few more years, and the result were pretty much the same: The majority of poor shots were made with magnums.
Those figures are not, in my opinion, an indictment of magnums. Rather they indicate that horsepower does not make up for poor shot placement. And given equal shot placement, bigger cartridges have little real advantage because, well, dead is dead.
...
One reason smaller cartridges have fared so well over the years is that just about any hunter can shoot them well. Conversely, the list of hunters who can deliver accurate shots consistently with hot magnum cartridges is much shorter.
...
I’ve slain a mountain of game with the light-kicking .260 Rem. It works splendidly, dropping deer in their tracks and driving those long, 140 grain pills right through every deer-sized animal I’ve ever shot. My clients have fared equally well with the .260.