New, Like New, New & worn, 100%? and Honesty in Sales
New, Like New, New & worn, 100%? and Honesty in Sales
Gideon46 said:
(edited for brevity)
I'd be polite and then leave and I wouldn't argue or debate with a liar.
I do think it's right and even good to give honest feedback to businesses as long as you take the high road while doing it.
Is there room in your philosophy for repentance, reformation and forgiveness?
Suppose the retailer, apologizes, says "You are right, I was wrong. I had a moral lapse, and will never do it again." And he does it in such a way that you believe him. Would you give him another chance?
If your answer is "No", then I have to ask you what is the point of giving honest feedback using the high road?
Just my two cents' worth.
bob.a said:
If a gun sits in a retailer's case and is handled by a dozen prospective customers and then is sold, it's still considered new, though it might have picked up some wear from handling. Is it really "new"?
Any gun that did not come straight from the factory (wholesalers and jobbers don't count) to the retailer and also is not in 100% condition, is not "New" Even if it qualifies in every other way, it (in my mind) requires the qualification of its biography. So, "(unequivocally) New" is the norm. "New, with qualifications (read the biography) for everything else that is not unequivocally used.
I bought a new gun that had spent 16 months in the retailer's showcase and picked up a few deep scratches and lost half of its rear sight. It was "New", but lightly damaged. What would you call it, if not "New, with this biography". I have a couple of guns that are absolutely in the same condition as when I bought them (retail), right down to the molecular level. They are better than "LNIB". But since they have been owned by a retail buyer... they are not "New", but..they are "New, with this qualification".
So, there are my opinions.
Lost Sheep