Snicker all you want, but before you snicker too long or too loud, understand what the terms are.HiBC said:And,regarding 23 vs 28 for a MAINSPRING, I agree its not worth arguing.I said 28,I was corrected to 23 lb.No big deal,I let it go.
But since the whizzing contest persists,for no particular good reason
Kuhnhausen, "A Shop Manual" Vol 2,3rd edition,paperback ...in mine,its page
156. Figure 157.
Drawing :M1911/1911A1 mainspring (hammer spring) specification ,spring rate,27.7 lbs at free length of 2.156 in. rate,compressed to 1.062 is 29.5 +/- 2 lbs
Agreed. A lot of people just scrapped the entire ILS mainspring housing and replaced it with standard parts -- as I did with the only Springfield I own. Springfield seems to have finally gotten the message -- last year they abandoned the ILS.Jim Watson said:Springfield with ILS is getting mighty close to departing from my definition of "1911". The stiff spring is to make up for the lack of room for a real 1911 mainspring under the cap with lock notch.
OT: Is "snicker" the new buzz word for disagreement? Just asking....Don't! Unless it's strictly a range toy. And even then, don't.
The 1911A1 can, and has gone full auto. ALWAYS because some combination of parts is not working correctly, and from what I have heard and seen, nearly always because someone tried to "improve" the trigger pull.
I missed something in my previous statement. So, here I try again. With a functional disconnector, 1/2 cock notch and a sear that rotates back to the hammer, the 1911 cannot go full auto.
Yes, even if the hammer jars off the full cock notch, it should be caught by the half cock, BUT we have no way of knowing if Bubba's shade tree trigger job left the parts still in condition to do that...reliably
Hunter_Customs said:You also educate your self in proper gun handling skills, one of which is your finger does not go to the trigger until you are ready to fire the gun.
If this is done then trigger pull weight is a moot point.