To start with, I'm sorry if I ask any redundant questions here. The forum search function isn't working for me for whatever reason.
I'm looking into buying my first (and quite possibly last) revolver. I'm 24, only started shooting about a year ago, and own a walther p22 (which, despite it's flaws, I'm fond of) and a yugo SKS (which came to me in great condition and is a plinkers dream). Recently I went to the range and shot .38s out of a friends S&W 686 and found myself falling in love.
So: I've decided to plunk down the money and get a revolver for myself, mostly for shooting targets but maybe for bedside someday. Seeing as how this'll be my first and last revolver, I plan on buying new unless something irresistible comes my way. Specifically I've been looking at the new S&W 520, which seems like it'd be a little lighter due to the titanium cylinder but still be hefty enough to still be able to hit targets (hence why I wouldn't bother with any of the more expensive scandium frames, despite briefly falling in love with the 327 before coming to my senses). The fact that it looks killer and won't break the bank also helps.
So, now that I have a somewhat stiff idea in my head, questions abound.
1. Anyone tried one of these out yet? Anyone have a compelling reason not to go this route?
2. I have no experience with S&Ws various frame revolvers (their selling point of being an "updated L-frame replacement for the well respected K-frame model 19 that is no longer in production" is greek to me). Would currently available 7 shot speedloaders designed for the 686 work with the 520? Do any surprises await for me after handling and enjoying a 686?
3. I'm aware that you can shoot .38 out of a .357, and I would likely usually do this at the range. My question is why are SOME revolvers (S&W or other brands) marketed as .38/.357 and some marketed as .357 only? Is there really any reason for this? I only ask because the 527 is classified as a .357 while other S&Ws are marketed as .38/.357, and I wanted to make absolutely sure there was no real reason for this before I plunked money down for a less versatile handgun than I wanted. Again, I know that asking the difference between .38 and .357 is a pretty common question, but I was curious and concerned as to this specific point.
Sorry to bore y'all with so much detail. Thought you might like a good story rather than 3 little dinky sentences, and thanks in advance for any kind words
I'm looking into buying my first (and quite possibly last) revolver. I'm 24, only started shooting about a year ago, and own a walther p22 (which, despite it's flaws, I'm fond of) and a yugo SKS (which came to me in great condition and is a plinkers dream). Recently I went to the range and shot .38s out of a friends S&W 686 and found myself falling in love.
So: I've decided to plunk down the money and get a revolver for myself, mostly for shooting targets but maybe for bedside someday. Seeing as how this'll be my first and last revolver, I plan on buying new unless something irresistible comes my way. Specifically I've been looking at the new S&W 520, which seems like it'd be a little lighter due to the titanium cylinder but still be hefty enough to still be able to hit targets (hence why I wouldn't bother with any of the more expensive scandium frames, despite briefly falling in love with the 327 before coming to my senses). The fact that it looks killer and won't break the bank also helps.
So, now that I have a somewhat stiff idea in my head, questions abound.
1. Anyone tried one of these out yet? Anyone have a compelling reason not to go this route?
2. I have no experience with S&Ws various frame revolvers (their selling point of being an "updated L-frame replacement for the well respected K-frame model 19 that is no longer in production" is greek to me). Would currently available 7 shot speedloaders designed for the 686 work with the 520? Do any surprises await for me after handling and enjoying a 686?
3. I'm aware that you can shoot .38 out of a .357, and I would likely usually do this at the range. My question is why are SOME revolvers (S&W or other brands) marketed as .38/.357 and some marketed as .357 only? Is there really any reason for this? I only ask because the 527 is classified as a .357 while other S&Ws are marketed as .38/.357, and I wanted to make absolutely sure there was no real reason for this before I plunked money down for a less versatile handgun than I wanted. Again, I know that asking the difference between .38 and .357 is a pretty common question, but I was curious and concerned as to this specific point.
Sorry to bore y'all with so much detail. Thought you might like a good story rather than 3 little dinky sentences, and thanks in advance for any kind words