Interesting case. personally, I would have found not guilty. Why? Because they had no hard evidence. Did I think he did it? Sure he did.
Same as the OJ case. I would have voted not guilty. Did he do it? Sure as the sun rises in the east.
The point is, I believe in the innocent until proven guilty standard. In neither case (OJ and no gun) is proof of guilt shown (and please, I don't want to start the damn OJ trial over).
BTW, I am curious about felons and firearms. I take it that ANY felony conviction prevents ownership/possesion of firearms???
Even for non-violent stuff?? Such as, an 19 year old joy rides in a car, pays his price in jail, and behaves for 20 years STILL can not own a firearm?? How about a shoplifter that steals $250 (felony amount I think)??
Seriously curiuous.
James