XL 650 and 550C

S

Stats Shooter

New member
Anyone have either of them? The Dillon xl 650 or 550?

I am in the market for a new progressive press to speed up production for .40 S&W, 556x45, and 7.62x51. Along with shooting F-CLASS, my local gun club has begun doing some XTC matches and steels for pistol every other week. There are Teams and I was asked to be on a team from work.

I use 3 different rock chuckers for my hunting and F-CLASS rifle but I have a job and two kids, and a 40 acre home /property to maintain. So I can't spend all my time in front of single stage presses. And I got rid of my RCBSpro chucker 5 because it kept breaking the priming arm among other things but the priming system was a disappointment. (i love most other RCBS products though)

So I'm thinking about a Dillon, maybe a LnL from Hornady but everything I hear about Dillon is that they are the gold standard for progressive presses. And after fighting an RCBS, I will spend what I need to spend to not have to fix my press all the time
 
I have both of them. The 650 is better for production, the 550 is better to convert from one caliber to another.
 
agree 100% with mr. morris.
i can honestly produce 750 rnds an hour with my xl650 if i prepare (pre-fill primer tubes and have bullets and powder at hand). this rate is actually pretty easy after you have run a few.

i also think the auto indexing (xl 650) is safer.

both are awesome presses. i've owned both.

still own and use the xl 650...my first press.

bob
 
i can honestly produce 750 rnds an hour with my xl650 if i prepare (pre-fill primer tubes and have bullets and powder at hand). this rate is actually pretty easy after you have run a few
Click to expand...

Can you ballpark a production rate on the 550?
 
Thanks Von,

I'm leaning 550C. The 650 looks great, but there are an awful lot of moving parts to take full advantage of it. The manual indexing isn't a big deal to me, and it is one less thing to break. 4 stations is plenty because I do not crimp anything except lever action rifles
 
I've done 300-400 per hour on the 550b. But mostly I do batches of 100 because I'm not in any hurry.

I really like it because it's a little of everything. Use it as a single stage, two stage, three stage or four. Back it up if you need to check something. Tool head changes take seconds. And (with my Redding dies) it makes fantastic quality ammo.

With the amount of shooting I do (once weekly) I don't think I'll ever outgrow it. And they're local so that's great.
 
Last edited:
I can run 100 rounds on a decked out 650 in just under 4 min.

The same 100 rounds on an SD takes about 9:30 and I am a bit slower than that on the 550.
 
And another question that has been asked 100s of times.

I own a 550 and did own a 650. Got rid of the latter and kept the former due to the 650 being less forgiving of mistakes.
 
I have the 650 and love it, never an issue with it. IMO the auto index is safer and one less thing to think about and worry about. I don't run super fast production rates, take it nice and easy and you don't have mistakes or you can at least catch them very easily.
 
Can you ballpark a production rate on the 550?
Click to expand...

The 650, with its auto-indexing, is going to have a superior production rate compared to the 550. It also has a 5th station, which is often an advantage.

So it follows if production rate is among your highest priorities, then the 650 is the press for you.

I have a 550BL (I guess "BL" stands for basic loader). But I don't load progressively like most other people do. I split the brass reconditioning and actual loading into separate steps. To me, they are completely different things and I can not mentally, and thus, physically merge them. Point is, for this conversation, although I have a 550, I can not answer your quoted question as you need it answered.

If I loaded progressively in a conventional manner, I would have bought a 650 without question or hesitation. And I believe, so should you.
 
I thought we were talking
cessna_650citationvii_holgerfrank.jpg


and

538101086_5db0e60e33_z.jpg
 
Auto indexing and the 5th station for a powder check die...makes the 650, hands down, the better progressive press of the two.

a. 650 is faster
b. Auto Indexing removes a chance of "human error" ..by forgetting to rotate base.
c. Powder check is a significant additional safety factor as you are running high volumes.

I've had a 650 for probably 15 yrs...and for what its worth, I'd buy another 650 again... ----- and I will for our weekend/seasonal 2nd home.
 
All great points. I started this thread to get the pros and cons of each press. And that is what I'm getting.


Another question then, it may sound stupid, but can you run the 650 without the auto bullet feed and auto case feed.

Also, is the cartridge conversion easy? I want to have a setup for .308, 556, 40s&w, and probably 9mm
 
650 doesn't need either bullet or case feed.
People still use the tubes for case feed without the collator without issue.

When I'm loading production pistol or .223 I use a bullet feeder.
When I'm loading hyper accuracy rounds, I install bullets manually because I'm picky about how the bullet starts/seats.

Check out YouTube if you are handy with hand tools, dozens of 5 gallon bucket collators builds on there, super easy to build and cheap too. (Maybe $30)

Bullet feeders for handguns are MUCH easier to build than the longer rifle bullets.
The version I settled on uses PVC (sch 40) drain pipe & pipe cap, and I use a speed controller on the motor, so it runs about $80 (minus feed die at the tool head).

The plastic runs about $15 retail at the big box stores, so if you screw it up, no huge loss and it beats a $500 Mr. Bullet Feeder up & down the block!
 
The 650 comes from Dillon with case feed. That is, everything to take cases from a feed tube and insert them into the shell plate comes with the base machine, already setup and ready to go.

The optional "case feeder" they sell is just a collator, all it does is fill the tube. That said, filling the tube is where the speed comes from.

Dillon does not sell a bullet feeder but there are various aftermarket ones out there. Again, without a collator, you are not going to be gaining much speed.

Cartridge conversion on the 650 is more involved simply because there are more parts to change, this is because you must change all of the case feed parts in addition to the shell plate, tool head, that you would have to do on both the 550 and 650.

The priming systems on the two are also different. The 650 primer feed system is the best one out of all the Dillon's IMO but none are as fast and easy to convert from one size to the other as the 550.
 
The extra station and auto indexing is what sold me on the 650. I've never had a squib at the range. The Powder Check System flat out works. I had it catch a empty case a couple of weeks ago when I was reloading 45 ACP for the first time. I had small primer brass slip though and get stuck when I was trying to prime. I must have switched the case then indexed it without charging the case with powder. The Powder Check System caught it. But, without a doubt that would've been my first squib load.
 
Last edited:
The case feeder on the 650 is a really great addition to the press...but yes, you can run the press without it. The case feeder does not come with the press...its an option / but the 650 was designed with the idea that most users would install the case feeder.

Bullet feeder is a different animal...not made by Dillon / and personally I think its a waste of money and by many accounts, they are a little hit and miss in terms of reliability. The "Mr Bulletfeeder" that Dillon endorses, reportedly runs pretty well...but its about a $475 option...and then caliber conversions are another $ 150 or so for the bullet feeder. ( 9mm, .357 mag, 38 super would all use the same caliber conversion / but you would need a conversion kit for .45 acp as an example ...)...

Don't confuse caliber conversion kits on the press ( for the press toolhead ) /with conversion kits on the bullet feeder.../ and you may need additional feed discs on the case feeder as well...small pistol, large pistol case, small rifle, etc...

Personally, I would add the case feeder....and hold off on the bullet feeder.

That 5th station on the 650 toolhead ...has nothing to do with crimping, like someone mentioned, its about adding the "powder check die" in station 3...and still have the seating die in station 4 and the final crimp/sizing die in station 5. The 550 is a 4 station tool head...and while some folks will install a powder check die in statiion 3...and then combine bullet seating and final sizing in station 4...its not recommended by Dillon and others.
 
Can you ballpark a production rate on the 550?
Click to expand...
With the primer tubes pre-filled I can load a comfortable 400 rounds per hour

Also, is the cartridge conversion easy? I want to have a setup for .308, 556, 40s&w, and probably 9mm
Click to expand...

On the 550 disconnect the failsafe rod, pull 2 pins and the tool head is off
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top