Wood or polymer stock?

Glocks are made from polymer. Never seen a polymer rifle stock. If you are refering to the cheap injection molded plastic stocks, then I prefer walnut. The cheap plastic stocks are more weather resistant and tougher than wood, but none of the plastic stocks are lighter than wood. They are the same weight and are often much heavier than the same rifle offered in walnut. There is a reason why Remington offers their Mt. Rifle in walnut and not the cheap plastic. They tried a couple of versions over the years, but all were heavier than the wood stocks. Same with the Savage Lightweight hunter. If you doubt me you should start weighing some guns and stocks on postal scales sometime.

The better stocks made from fiberglass or Kevlar are a different story. I much prefer them to walnut. I've had too many walnut stocks split, crack, warp and lose zero to ever trust one on a serious hunt. I have a few safe queens in walnut that occasionally get to hunt, but most of my rifles are stocked in McMillan's, Brown Precisions, or High-Tech specialties stocks. The good stocks are up to a pound lighter than either plastic or walnut, are much stronger, stiffer, durable and accurate than either. But they ain't cheap.
 
Glocks are made from injection-molded Nylon 6 - I think the stuff sells for about $3.50/lb. Synthetic stocks tend to be made from injection-molded glass-filled nylon. Both are plastic.
 
polymer (p l -m r) Any of various chemical compounds made of smaller, identical molecules (called monomers) linked together. Some polymers, like cellulose, occur naturally, while others, like nylon, are artificial. Polymers have extremely high molecular weights, make up many of the tissues of organisms, and have extremely varied and versatile uses in industry, such as in making plastics, concrete, glass, and rubber.

I like polymer for most of mine. Two reasons if I modify it and mess up replacements are cheap. It resists oil better than wood, sometimes i get heavy with the oil bottle.

Wood looks good especially laminated stocks, but deep woods off will rip into a wood finish like a hot knife through butter.
 
Solid definition of polymer mongo! I guess since I'm posting I better answer the question, I prefer wood for both looks and feel. Synthetic seems much more utilitarian, and to me a bolt action rifle is a piece of art as well as a tool.
 
I'll cast my vote in favor of wood simply because I value the aesthetic features of a rifle and don't believe the difference in performance between wood and plastic to be anything more than marginal.
 
Wood all the way.
But last year I picked up a Ruger 44/77. It was more of a “I need that” than anything else since I have this thing about 44’s. This is my first bolt action with a polymer stock. I really like this little sucker.
Ruger really has a way with building guns like the 77/44.
 
Last edited:
FWIW the Brown Precision synthetic stock on my 700 BDL LH .270 is definitely lighter weight than the original walnut stock. I have two Browning Stainless Stalker rifles that have the original Browning (brand) synthetic stocks and 26" barrels. Both rifles seem lighter than they would be with walnut stocks. Synthetic will never look nicer than decent walnut.
 
You dont see very many synthetics that are engraved and run in the $10k+ range. Nothing beats the beauty of a good piece of wood.
 
I prefer wood because it looks better (to me anyway) and I like how it feels especially over the "plastic" stocks that come on many rifles now. I will admit that I do like the good synthetic stocks like H-S precision and McMillian.
 
Another thought...

A wood stock with a gloss finish is certainly more delicate than a matte or oiled finish. I far prefer an oiled finish over a glossy one. An oil finish is repairable with some fine abrassive (400 grit paper, 0000 steel wool,etc) to blend out the scratch, followed by oil, wax, or scratch hider. A high-gloss finish can not be fixed in this manner.

I have seen M1 Garands that went through combat service in WWII and Korea, and the stocks on those were not too bad. I don't see how hunting can be more abusive than combat.
 
You dont see very many synthetics that are engraved and run in the $10k+ range. Nothing beats the beauty of a good piece of wood.

Guess you have never seen a Legend rifle by D'Arcy Echols. 10K is about the starting point for one of his DG rifles. He does awesome work with wood as well.
 
looking for synthetic stock

i have a interarms 7mm rem mag. it has a wood stock the previous owner didnt show it much love. i want to replace it with a synthetic stock. i have looked everywhere i can think of. i put an order in with ram-line firearms they seem to have their heads in there asses because i order it over 2 months ago they dont know where it is or when it can be shipped. so i am currently looking for a better dealer. if anyone know anyone give me a shout out. thanks
 
I love walnut, but I hate banging it up.. Lol... I've been going with the Kevlar stocks lately

egy4epes.jpg
 
wood, looks better, feels better, and my dad used it my granddad used it and my great granddad used it. you gonna tell me all them guys were wrong. and can you honestly say that 40 yrs from now you are gonna hand your 40 yr old plastic rifle down to your grand kid and tell him look at this beauty they don't build them like this anymore.
 
wood & Blue

I prefer wood & blue, it's traditional and reminds me of a time when true craftsmen took the time to build and shape a fine instrument to perfection by hand, one at a time ( that's why I prefer older weapons).
However hunting in the coastal woods of western Washington I have come to appreciate a good synthetic stocked rifle.
But I also have a couple of laminate stocked rifles as well (best of both worlds).
 
Back
Top