Frankly Jordan,
I have no problem with what you did. With a clear view both ways of at least a half a mile and with no one coming, I have no problem with a rolling stop. But why didn't you see the cop?
I run red lights and stop signs on a regular basis at 2 in the morning. I look both ways before I do, for two reasons, to see if anyone else is coming and to check for cops.
I'm sure I'll get caught one day. Don't worry though, I'll be polite!
My justification? Conservation of finite resources: Gas and Time.
From what I understand about your post is that common sense needs to prevail.
I detect a certain measure of hypocracy when we say that the individual needs to be responsible and experience the consequences of our actions, and then we come down on someone who's actions, even though they may be questionable, the results harm no one.
Take the lady who used her handgun at WalMart to prevent further injury to people from the knife weilding shoplifter.
The response from the LEA, "Well, it may have turned out fine THIS time, but it could be WORSE
next time!"
This is the pre-emptive mind-set, and it is damaging to liberty and freedom because it presupposes that such uses/actions are inherently dangerous and should be prohibited based upon the false assumption that "it could be worse next time."
It's a crock of $h1t, and Washington D.C. is full of it's stench.
By responsibly checking the intersection and slowing to a manageable speed, a citation for a rolling stop is just a revenue generator for your local Government.
------------------
John/az
"When freedom is at stake, your silence is not
golden, it's
yellow..."
RKBA!
www.cphv.com
[This message has been edited by John/az2 (edited May 25, 2000).]