Winchester model 94 and Micro Groove rifling

"Just as Marlin with the release of their 336 model in 1948 took Winchester to the next level".
The previous model Marlin, the 36 was just a 336 with a square bolt, probably not strong enough to become the 444. What level did this take the M94 to? Post 64 94's had cast receivers washed with a thin layer of metal that would take bluing, not so great.
I will agree that USRA Winchesters were well made, 94's had forged receivers. Lots of variations too.
 
I have a 336 Texan in 35 Remington, made in the first four months of 1955. It has Ballard rifling and is factory drilled/tapped, though I use the irons. Still works well for its intended purpose.

20211206_170338-1-1.jpg
 
The 336 I bought new in 1968 was drilled & tapped for a scope, so it got one. My son owns it now.
 

Attachments

  • 764953E7-161A-47FA-9AA1-7ECB918C0F30.jpeg
    764953E7-161A-47FA-9AA1-7ECB918C0F30.jpeg
    23.7 KB · Views: 43
I took my model 94 out again the other day to check the scope on it. It’s exactly 102 yards for the shooting distance. This rig is now 33 years old and still shoots a very tight group. I think this dispels any myths about microgroove rifling. I should mention that I always clean from the bore end of the barrel which is supposed to be a no no but clearly that’s a myth as well judging by the accuracy after 33 years :cool:


ba369c88-bd3c-4526-bc9c-7a4daf422016.jpeg
 
i have shot deer early in the morning and late in the afternoon in pretty heavy brush at pretty close ranges with a win timber carbine in 444 marlin that i never would have had a chance to shoot with open-reciever sights
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top