I thought anybody reading that comment would understand the context without me having to spell it out.
To clarify:
Nobody in the buying market asked to have Browning's original design modified to a point where unnecessary & undesirable alterations to a very workable rifle adversely affected usage.
Shooters neither needed nor requested such changes, and the result was an action that requires more force to operate, creates a clunky lever cycling, and creates a heavier trigger pull.
I did not blame Miroku, I specifically referred to changes "that the Browning project people had Miroku" make.
In other words, if I have not made my position entirely clear by now, I credit the Browning people with the degradation in performance, not Miroku.
And as an additional note, I'm very glad to see somebody like Turnbull "undo" those annoying lawyer-induced "safety" modifications.
Incidentally, they'll do just the conversion work, if you have a standard Miroku 92 already & want to send your rifle in for it.
Your choice of case colors or blue on the frame, after they do the tang work.
Denis