That would be a good question for Jerry Micklich.
And?????
That would be a good question for Jerry Micklich.
All handgun shooting does not fall into everyone's own personal shooting practices. As demonstrated by Jerry Miculek. He does not use it for hunting, self defense, etc. He found the .38 Super revolver fit the niche of rapid double-action revolver shooting...just for the sport/fun of it.And?????
I believe that brass is called .38 Super Comp, to distinguish it from the semi-rimmed .38 Super. It was developed specifically for use in semi-automatics, to alleviate the issues deriving from the semi-rimmed cases in box magazines. To use .38 Super Comp in a revolver when it's far easier and more logical to use .38 Super would be ... illogical.dahermit said:And, to muddy the waters even more, I do believe that Starline is producing both semi-rimmed (traditional .38 Super), brass and rimless .38 super that is intended to head space on the mouth of the case.
All handgun shooting does not fall into everyone's own personal shooting practices. As demonstrated by Jerry Miculek. He does not use it for hunting, self defense, etc. He found the .38 Super revolver fit the niche of rapid double-action revolver shooting...just for the sport/fun of it.
The .327 is a great cartridge, but the issue with it and .32's in general is there's almost no support by the industry to make more bullet options. .38 Super can use 9mm bullets, of which there are many options, many more than .32 at least.How about just considering a .327 Federal Magnum? Hits hard, shoots a number of different cartridges, Ruger is selling bunches of them. Henry makes a lever. Done deal.
Further, Ruger makes their throats for the .327 revolvers way too big and shooting lead bullets will lead the bore easy. I don't find .327 to be accurate in handguns, in the Henry it's incredibly accurate.
I used cut-down .38 Super brass in my Japanese Type 26 revolver; worked great.