You will learn more on the user's forum than a general forum
My opinion is that when people get agitated about brand issues - it's often about ego.
Before 2003 I owned Buicks. My last Buick was a Skyhawk. At 20,000 the thermostat needed to be replaced, at 35,000 the water pump went out on it. At 42,000 the alternator died. At 67,000 it needed a new starter. And it just got worse from there... one day while driving it just blew a rod. 82,000 RIP. Every time I took it into the shop I felt like I was getting robbed, and I also felt stupid for buying a Skyhawk. I felt like my purchase decision reflected on me personally. In 2003 I bought a Toyota. And deep inside I
really really wanted this car to be trouble-free, because then it affirms that I made a good purchase decision. Not only did I do something right, but it shows that I am smart and wise and make good decisions and I feel good about the whole thing. When I was on car talk forums, I found myself promoting the model and the brand and defending it, and I realize now, it was more about me wanting to feel good about my purchase decision and wanting to feel good about myself and less about the actual car. I have been very very happy with my Toyota. I am only one Toyota owner of millions, but I can say for myself that I went over 100,000 miles last month and I have never had one single problem with this vehicle.
Unless someone works for a particular firearms manufacturer, when I see them vociferously defending a brand, my opinion is that they're really defending themselves.
No one likes to face the prospect that they made a bad purchasing decision or what that says about them. No one likes to have their judgment called into question, and I think that leads to about 75% of the emotion behind either the brand bashing or the fanatical defense or promotion of brands.
If someone purchased brand XYZ and it stove pipes every 50 rounds, it's easier to chalk it up as still braking in versus hassling with the gun shop or manufacturer and /or admitting that you made a bad decision with this particular brand. And if someone says that the brand has quality issues - it hits a nerve with the person who owns that brand and you hear them defending it, but really it's being generated by their own anxiety about plunking down $800.00 for something that doesn't work. They are really defending themselves - they are saying "I'm not dumb for spending $800.00 on this brand - I'm smart, I'm right and you're wrong and here's why"
I think people tend to defend their "brand" more on general forums like this and less on the brand-specific user's forum. If someone buys a Calico Liberty pistol and talks abut it here and someone says it's junk - they might defend it rather than tell people what's really going on. But in a forum of all Calico users - they are all willing to be honest with whatever problems thay are having.
On this forum you'll read a lot from Kahr users about how it is flawless. On the Kahrtalk forum you'll read posts, one Kahr user to another about any problems or frustrations they are having with their pistol. The same thing is true for Rohrbaugh, Taurus or any other pistol.
I think on a general forum like this you can post a question and all of a sudden you've stirred up the brand haters and the fanboys and it becomes Hatfields and McCoys. On the brand-specific forum you don't get that.
Here are a few Dan Wesson groups/forums/links:
http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/danwesson/
http://www.danwessonforum.com/forum
http://forums.1911forum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=52