Why is Glock still building the 20SF, 21SF, 29SF & 30SF models?

B

BluRidgDav

New member
I mean, since the release of Gen 4, what is the purpose of the older Gen 3 SF line of pistols?

Why not buy a Gen 4 model 20, 21, 29 or 30, and then just leave the extra back-straps in the box?

You get the new Gen 4 checkering pattern, new ambidextrous (capable) Gen 4 magazine release,
and before you add an optional back-strap; the grip of a new Gen 4 is the same smaller size as an older Gen 3 SF grip.

Thanx, Dave
 
Last edited:
I think in markets/states like California Glock only markets the Gen3. Most likely because each model has to be approved, a costly endeavor.
 
Probably, because you can't buy a Gen 4 in California, unless you are in law enforcement. It's not the cost but the rules to get a new firearm on the roster. Since the technology does not exist to serial number every case the new firearm expels, it is really a way for the liberal democrates to impose a gun ban in the state of California.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a model 41, but would have happily bought the same pistol on a Gen 3 frame.

I get along just fine with the SF frames, and all my other Glocks are Gen 3.
 
I prefer my Gen3 9mm Glocks over the Gen4 versions. I don't see the point in paying that extra $ for an extra factory mag when "IMHO" a Magpul is just as good for $15.99. And why pay for a backstrap kit if you don't use it? I've had my Gen3 17 since 2009, and my latest Gen3 19 for just a few months. I like the rubber Talon grip that I put on my 19, I'm not sure how that would fit on a Gen4 if I had a bigger backstrap on it:confused:

Now my Gen4 21 is a different story, I think I shoot this one better with the large beavertail backstrap on it, and that wider slide used to slice the web of my shooting hand every time, until I put that backstrap on:cool:
 
Why is Glock still building the 20SF, 21SF, 29SF & 30SF models?

I live in California and you can get the gen4SF as I have a Glock 21. The trouble is California charges a premium price and they are still limited supply. Not all GEN4SFs are available. I have found the 20 and 21 available.

I also took mine and bought ZEV Internals! Great shooter. Many other mods, new tritium sight and ....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Yesterday I bought another Gen 3 G21 SF because, being left handed, I much prefer the mag release. The button is small and sticks out so I can easily hit it with my trigger finger. As many left handers will tell you, having the mag release under your trigger finger makes a lot more sense it being under your thumb. Don't have to reposition your grip during mag changes and it's faster all things being equal.

Gen 3 is also cheaper. To me the 4 isn't worth the extra $.
 
Last edited:
Winterhawk, What in the name of the retail store in SoCal where an ordinary citizen can purchase a brand new Gen 4? Not used.
 
I know this... most of the companies that customize Glocks do so off the Gen3 platform. I don't know why, but they do... and there's a huge market for them.
 
burrhead said:
Gen 3 is also cheaper. To me the 4 isn't worth the extra $.
Click to expand...
I think the Gen 4's biggest selling point is the recoil reducing dual recoil spring assembly. I shot a G22 Gen 3 and a G35 Gen 4 and the difference was night and day.

The backstraps are also cool for the Gen 4's. The OP has a point, but the fact is that the Gen 3's are established in the market and have such longevity and reliability that they're never going anywhere.
 
Lots of bros dig the G3s. G4s... not proven yet to many, and some won't ever have one due to the ejection problems they've had in the past.
 
Thanx for the input, guys!

But, I wasn't trying to start a Gen 3 -vs- Gen 4 debate.

I was curious about Glock's business decision to continue manufacturing the old SF models, when the bare grip size of new Gen 4's is the same.

Thanx, Dave.
 
I think post #2 nailed it. "Because people still buy them." Some buy Gen 3 because that's what they prefer; some buy Gen 3 because Gen 4 hasn't been approved for civilian sale in CA. Regardless, people still buy them and if they're buying them in enough numbers to keep it profitable, Glock will keep making them.
 
Why is Glock still building the 20SF, 21SF, 29SF & 30SF models?

BluRidgDav said:
But, I wasn't trying to start a Gen 3 -vs- Gen 4 debate.

I was curious about Glock's business decision to continue manufacturing the old SF models, when the bare grip size of new Gen 4's is the same.
Click to expand...


The debate ultimately has to do with that...

If people don't want a Gen 4, a .45 or 10mm SF frame is a better choice for them than a Gen 4.

Glock did try to expand their 21 frame options in the same generation... remember the 21 with the 1913 rail? They also did the 21 with an ambidextrous release. Only model that they did it with (could say the RTF was similar, but broader), and never did it again on commercial pistols.

Glock will do these minor changes to meet a contract, as the FBI guns without the finger grooves.
 
Sorry, "Because people still buy them." does not explain this.

If that was true, then Glock would continue to make Gen 3's in all of their other models, too. Which they don't.
They have stopped manufacturing Gen 3's in all of their most popular models in .357 SIG, 9mm and .40 S&W calibers.

The ONLY Gen 3's still in their line-up are the four wide-body SF models that I asked about, and four other narrower .45 ACP/GAP caliber guns: 30S, 36, 38 and 39.

This has something to do with frame size/design of the 10mm & .45 caliber models only, not popularity.

Thanx again, Dave.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top