Wunderwaffe
New member
Goes back to 1985 when the army made the blunder and adopted the M9. Then the floodgates opened and almost everyone wanted one. I wouldnt have had objections if they went with the Sig P-226. But if I recall, one of the standards was that it accommodated smaller hands. The double stacker mag+grips made it fatter than the 1911!
For me, Beretta 92s sights are too small, grips too wide, slide release short and small,and the trigger could be better.
I agree with Snub that 40 S&W was the answer to a problem that never existed...well, maybe a financial problem
For me, Beretta 92s sights are too small, grips too wide, slide release short and small,and the trigger could be better.
I agree with Snub that 40 S&W was the answer to a problem that never existed...well, maybe a financial problem