Anyone who did not waste time watching the "debate".
When you're right you're right.
Anyone who did not waste time watching the "debate".
Kinda weird seeing a conservative republican.. I thought they were extinct. . .
I didn't watch the debate but I do want to know which ones raised their hands when asked if they didn't believe in evolution.
I don't know who won but any of them most certainly lost.
Seriously?"And the main thing ... I'm not sure what in the world that has to do with being president of the United States," said the former Arkansas governor.
oy, that's my fear, that there are enough people in this country that don't think the leader of the most technologically advanced nation on the planet - the one responsible for the majority of the world's scientific progress since its inception - should have a basic understanding of scienceIf you fail at basic science, why should that disqualify you for the presidency? We already have one that states he doesn't read much.
I would also like to see this... but I think emotions are currently a little too high.I searched the transcript and there was no mention of gun control. I wonder why?
I would have liked to see Mitt and Rudy deal with it. Also, the various 'hunters'.
lrcfanMessage #3052
05/05/07 06:26 PM Hawaii and Alabama Libertarians, I am also wondering why no "insta poll" data has been released. Does anyone know if such polling data was released after the dem debate, and if so, how long after the debate?
Also, ABC has now changed their poll to include Dr. Paul as a choice. What sort of pressure must they have rec'd in order to make such a change?
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who barely registers in public opinion polls of the Republican presidential field, won last Thursday night's debate.
That was the unmistakable conclusion of the online poll posted by debate sponsor MSNBC, which registered Paul with higher positive ratings and lower negative numbers than any of the other nine candidates on the stage.