Which handgun designs interest you the most, and why?
For me it's...
1911 – I like that it has no screws (except for the grips), no roll pins, and can be easily disassembled completely. Also the very comfortable grip.
Hi-Power – The early ones. The most comfortable (to me) grip of a double stack magazine pistol. Super easy takedown. I also like the interesting trigger system that doesn't add width to the frame. Unfortunately they messed up and added roll pins to save a few bucks on the later ones.
Glock – Such a simple design using very few parts, with easy takedown. Very innovative and essentially trouble free from the start from someone new to firearms design (at the time of introduction).
The Colt Woodsman – The roots of so many fine 22 pistols lead back to this Browning design.
Compared to the above, I find most other auto pistol designs of little interest. I like some aspects of the CZ75, but the use of several roll pins leaves me cold. I also don't care for the vertically short slide necessitated by the outside frame rails. The result is small slide serrations that make racking the slide more difficult. But the CZ75 is still a nice gun.
Smith and Wesson double action revolvers – many of the ones made in the last 50+ years, because of the trigger. They manage to offer competitively priced revolvers that feature a very good trigger.
Ruger Redhawk – The clever use of a single spring for both hammer and trigger return. The crane latch at the front. The solid frame. A gun designed for magnum cartridges from the start. And it shows. Over the long haul.
Ruger Old Model Blackhawks – A maintaining of the good features and much of the handling of Colt's SAA with much more durability. Yes, it's practically just a 5 shooter (like the SAA), but it makes that great clicking sound when the hammer is cocked.
Ruger New Model Blackhawks – Yes, according to some they ruined the Blackhawk. But it's a true 6 shooter and I like simply opening and closing the loading gate to load/unload safely. Yet another great design effort by the Ruger team.
For me it's...
1911 – I like that it has no screws (except for the grips), no roll pins, and can be easily disassembled completely. Also the very comfortable grip.
Hi-Power – The early ones. The most comfortable (to me) grip of a double stack magazine pistol. Super easy takedown. I also like the interesting trigger system that doesn't add width to the frame. Unfortunately they messed up and added roll pins to save a few bucks on the later ones.
Glock – Such a simple design using very few parts, with easy takedown. Very innovative and essentially trouble free from the start from someone new to firearms design (at the time of introduction).
The Colt Woodsman – The roots of so many fine 22 pistols lead back to this Browning design.
Compared to the above, I find most other auto pistol designs of little interest. I like some aspects of the CZ75, but the use of several roll pins leaves me cold. I also don't care for the vertically short slide necessitated by the outside frame rails. The result is small slide serrations that make racking the slide more difficult. But the CZ75 is still a nice gun.
Smith and Wesson double action revolvers – many of the ones made in the last 50+ years, because of the trigger. They manage to offer competitively priced revolvers that feature a very good trigger.
Ruger Redhawk – The clever use of a single spring for both hammer and trigger return. The crane latch at the front. The solid frame. A gun designed for magnum cartridges from the start. And it shows. Over the long haul.
Ruger Old Model Blackhawks – A maintaining of the good features and much of the handling of Colt's SAA with much more durability. Yes, it's practically just a 5 shooter (like the SAA), but it makes that great clicking sound when the hammer is cocked.
Ruger New Model Blackhawks – Yes, according to some they ruined the Blackhawk. But it's a true 6 shooter and I like simply opening and closing the loading gate to load/unload safely. Yet another great design effort by the Ruger team.
Last edited:
