I'm no fanboy. Fanboys try to convince everyone their product is superior. My argument all along has been that LEE products get the job done, very well, for 1/3 the cost... and that ALL equipment has it's difficulties, regardless of brand. I defend LEE when folks liken it to harbor freight products, because that comparison grossly inadequate. More often, the OP has specifically stated that they are new to reloading, on a tight budget, or looking for a feature that LEE happens to offer. Being a LEE user, I offer my opinion of the product from experience. Note: you'll never see one disparaging comment about other equipment in ANY of my posts, other than to say that ALL brands of equipment can be frustrating... something I have experienced when using or watching my friends' equipment operate.
You, however, have time and again stated that, as a new loader and "engineer", you have determined that LEE is substandard, or looks cheap, but you have no personal experience with the product. I suspect you tend to abide by the old adage, "You get what you pay for" and determined early on in your quest for a room full of new toys that LEE couldn't possibly offer a quality product because it costs so much less than the next closest competitor. I'm not calling you a snoot, but the attitude you've taken towards any product you haven't deemed worthy, on looks alone, is a bit snooty.
And then there's the comments about innovation. While you might be a brilliant engineer, you're no historian. LEE was there in the beginning... the infancy of modern reloading, and designed systems that Dillon and RCBS and Redding all built theirs around. LEE was THE innovators, and while they may not be setting the world on fire lately, neither is anyone else.