Thoughts on Hoosier Deer Rifles
Hey there, Hoosiers!
This Virginian thinks that you folks have some odd laws concerning legal deer rifle chamberings. However, I have kin in Indiana, and so I thought that I'd butt right in on the conversation.
First of all, some of the suggested legal chamberings listed in the Indiana Hunting Regs are just plain unsuitable for shooting a deer. For instance, I have a .44 Special revolver, and I think that .44 Special may be the best self-defense round ever designed--but shoot a deer with something with about 300 foot pounds of muzzle energy?
The easy choice would be to pick up a nice lever-action .44 Magnum. Rifles and ammunition are easily available, it has adequate energy for whitetails out to 100 yards. Easy, but who wants easy? So, in the spirit of nothing being too hard for the man that doesn't have to do it himself, here are a few thoughts from the Old Dominion.
The best existing (or slightly obsolete) chambering is probably the fine .357 Remington Maximum. Never seen one, you say? Well, neither have I, but it's ballistics are going to be pretty good considering the limitations in the Regs. The .357 Max was intended as a revolver round (in which applications it had some flame-cutting problems), though a few TC single-shot pistols were chambered in it for silhouette shooting. The only rifles that I've ever heard of being chambered for it were a very rare Savage Model 24 and a semi-custom TC rifle. CNC Cartridge and Grizzly Cartridge still produce the ammunition, but the large ammo makers no longer do. Here's a Hoosier who has a website devoted to it:
http://357maximum.com/
He's using a TC rifle as well as a modified Ruger Model 1. If you wanted to use a .357 Maximum, the TC is probably the easiest way to go; their custom shop will build you one; it's a SAAMI-certified round, and they will have the chamber reamers.
But, what if . . ..? What if Indiana deer hunters could design a chambering for their own purposes, designed to fit into the existing Regs but give them deer rifle performance of a very high order? [Drum roll . . . ], how about the " .357 Hoosier?"
Never heard of the .357 Hoosier, you say? Well, that's because it doesn't exist; it's just a gleam in some wild Virginian's eye. This would take a real wildcatter (and I'm not one), but here's an approach. Start with the existing .25 WSSM super-short case. Neck it up from .257 to .357. Then trim it by 45 thousandths in order to bring it down to the 1.625-inch upper limit in the Indiana Regs. There are lots of .357 spitzer hunting bullets. Voila! What, you complain? No gun? Picky, picky, picky. Yes, the first time, anyhow, you'd have to do what wildcatters do: characterize the round and have a machine shop or (preferably) a gunsmith create a chamber reamer. Existing .357 rifle barrels are, in general (except for .357 Magnum), chambered for rounds longer than the .357 Hoosier, so you'd probably have to order an unchambered barrel and have the gunsmith ream the chamber. Then what? You still don't have a gun to put the barrel on. The virtue of starting with an existing (and very new) round like the .25 WSSM is that the Winchester Model 70 is currently chambered for it--the Model 70 bolt face and magazines currently accept it. So, the gunsmith buys a Model 70 action and finished stock and installs the barrel. My guess is that you'd have a very accurate (accuracy is the driving force behind the WSSM concept) rifle which would deliver bullets in the 150 - 180 grain range with perhaps 2,300 foot pounds of muzzle energy which is just about what you want from a deer rifle. It would probably retain energy out to about 300 yards of over 1,000 foot pounds--the old Townsend Whelen rule-of-thumb for deer rifles. I would expect a +/- 3" maximum point blank range of about 225 yards. In other words, it would be not just an Indiana-legal deer rifle, it would be a well-balanced deer rifle for any state in the Union. Recurring cost (sans scope) of about $1,000: a kilobuck to kill a buck.
The other "suggested" cartridges in the Indiana Regs are all pistol--or rifle/pistol--cartridges. I haven't looked at the underlying legislation, but the Regs based on that legislation don't say that the cartridge has to be straight-sided, and the .38-40, which is one of the suggestions, is slightly bottle-necked, being a .44-40 necked down to .401.
Actually, there might be an Indiana niche market here. A guy could start producing these rifles and commission a custom loader to produce the ammunition.
Like I say, time on my hands and a computer in front of me.
Good hunting!