When is Browning 1911-380 being released?

JJNA

New member
Does anyone have a club when this might happen? Late last year, I heard January 2015, but that came and went and nada.
 
1911-380

I was at the NRA Great American Outdoor Show in Harrisburg, PA on Sunday the 8th. I went to the Browning booth and asked to look at one. The guy got one out of a display case and let me handle. What a dandy! I kept asking him when they were REALLY going to be available - he kept saying a well rehearsed SOON!
 
I'd rather have a 9mm in a metal 1911. The 380 is inferior and the ammo is more expensive and harder to find.
 
@kcub I'd rather have a 9mm in a metal 1911. The 380 is inferior and the ammo is more expensive and harder to find.
Au contraire. The 380 has better geometry for the miniaturized 1911 than the 9mm in a full size does. There are issues feeding 9mm in a full size 1911 frame/slide. If you're going full sized, might as well go 45. The 380 is perfect for a miniaturized 1911 IMHO.
There is nothing wrong with the .380 in a CQB or carry gun. I, as many have seen it break things at 50-to- 100 yards that place it a rung above a sledge hammer.

-SS-
 
I have a Les Baer 9mm that's ragged hole accurate, has never failed, and has negligible recoil. It's my favorite handgun. I have 45s but they just aren't as much fun to shoot. That's what matters. Maybe a 380 1911 is a hoot to shoot as well.
 
Ok, ok. I don't care for these inane caliber wars here. That's not why I asked about the 1911-380. I just want to know WHEN it is being released for sale.
 
Supposedly the same size as Browning's 1911-22. I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this size. It's about the same thickness as Sig/Kimber 380's, but longer barreled and longer gripped. "Right size" is about right.

I hope, though, it is fitted & finished better with more rugged parts than the 1911-22 I have.
 
These new .380 single actions from Browning and RIA, as well as the .22s, remind me of the old Star and Llamas in those calibers. Star in particular made a huge variety of pistols, all mostly based on Browning designs. They were nice enough and the workmanship was good but the quality of the metal was a little weak sometimes.
 
There are issues feeding 9mm in a full size 1911 frame/slide.

I think this issue is pretty much in the past. I have a Dan Wesson, Smith and Wesson and a Springfield in 9mm that run everything I have put through them. Only the Springfield needed a little extractor tuning to run JHP reliably.

None have needed any kind of feedramp modification. If Sig made one. . .I would buy it also. Maybe they do. . . . .I have not checked lately.
 
I've owned full-sized government models in .45, 9mm and .38 Super (my favorite) and only had feeding problems now and then with .45 reloads. I had a Star 9mm that would not feed hollow points but would work with lead reloads, even including 158-grain 9mm hand loads.

I like the .22 Browning but I just realized I haven't been in a gun shop since before Christmas. Where does the time go? While a .380 version makes a lot of sense, I'd be happy with a .22. If I could only afford one. When I get an itch to buy something really bad, that's when I have to sell something. I don't think I've owned anything that I wish I could have kept but didn't.

The .380 ACP is closely related to the .45 ACP, design-wise. The .32 ACP is closely related to the .38 Super. There is a 9mm Browning Long, too, and I suspect it may be like the .380. Both the .32 ACP and the .38 Super (and .38 ACP, same case) are "semi-rimmed."
 
"Dandy pistol"

Right out the gate, it got the "dandy" Quinn seal of approval. I reckon that seal ranks right up there with Good Housekeeping, UL, and J.D. Power! As if I needed any more encouragement to purchase this one!
 
Back
Top