What's the smallest/lightest handgun (any caliber) that you shoot well?

Was looking for a .380 and thought I was going LCR without a doubt. Loved the size. Went to the range with a buddy and we were both shocked. I couldn't group to save my life (which is the point right?)

Did more research and went to the range to try a couple more options. I was amazed at the Sig P238 and picked it up right there on the spot. It's a bit more money but I'm confident with it in my hand.
 
Hmmmm....I've got a short barreled (is there any other kind) Sig P290 that weighs 20+ oz, and measures 5.5" x 3.9". That little beast will put 6 through a ragged hole at 10 yds from my antiquated and modified Weaver Stance.. It's far more accurate than I've ever thought possible with a 2.9" barreled, short stocked pistol (only two finger on the stock with the six rd mag in place) and 9mm at that! Here it is! Best regards, Rod

P1010268.jpg
 
Here's the other side of the coin...my wife's former S&W M-36, j-frame, .38 special with a 3" barrel and adjustable sights. It's one of the most shootable small revolvers I've had the pleasure to shoot. This one once put a full cylinder full into 1-1/4" at 35 yds...that's thirty five yards...albeit with a crimson trace grip on it. I shot that remarkable group from the hip, with both elbows tucked in and braced strongly; as is possible with a laser sight. Too, it was shot at dusk! That cylindrer full settled once and for all, my practice ammunition...(a 158 gr LSWC and 4.3 gr of Winchester 231). The gun is now my #1 pick for concealed carry...but the Sig P290, slightly thinner in profile is a close #2 pick. The pic below shows it with the rosewood stocks installed...my wife has requisitioned the Crimson Trace grips for her S&W M-637....Rod

3inchChiefsSpecial.jpg
 
The smallest handgun I have shot was a PM 9 and i shot it reasonably well. I wouldn't want to go any smaller though.
 
What's the smallest/lightest handgun (any caliber) that you shoot well?
I suspect most people shoot more accurately with guns that have a little heft, longer barrels, and hand-filling grips. And therefore, they probably shoot worse with tiny pocket guns. I'm interested in guns that provide a good compromise between "shootability" and portability.

Which smaller sized handguns perform best for you at the range?

So far, Kel Tec PF9.

Smaller than that, we shall see. I haven't done much with guns smaller than the PF9 yet.

"Shootability" between the PF9 and the micro-380 class guns may hinge on the difference between the two finger vs. one finger grip. Two finger grip is not a problem for me.
 
Believe it or not,,,

This little 22-PLY from Taurus,,,
Is very easy to shoot accurately.

PLY-hand.jpg


It has a natural point-ability that is somewhat amazing to me,,,
I can consistently hit a 8" circle at 25 yards with this gun.

It fits my J-frame & K-frame size hands very nicely.

Aarond

.
 
I shoot the NAA .22 Short revolvers fairly well, except the barrel/cylinder gap burns my thumb.

I have found that some degree of accuracy is obtained by holding the grips between the thumb and forefinger of the shooting hand, and pressing the trigger with the forefinger of the other hand, coming up from below the pistol. A fair amount of accuracy is possible clear out to three or four feet.

Bob Wright
 
+1 for the Sig P238. I had one for a while until my wife shot it. I bought a better model for her with night sights and finally got mine back. With proper technique it is surprisingly accurate.
 
Kel-Tec P11

The smallest pistol I can shoot well (that I have tried) is a Kel-Tec P11, which is a 9mm that weighs 14 oz. empty and holds 10 rounds in a double-stack magazine. I have a pinky extension on the magazine, and feel this is essential to shooting it well.

This gun is easy to carry and conceal in a Fobus paddle holster. I also have a couple of pocket holsters for it. It will easily fit in a jacket pocket, or even in the front pocket of a looser fitting pair of jeans or in the back pocket of a pair of carpenter jeans, like a wallet, using a pocket holster.

These guns can be had for about $300. Some people hate the long trigger pull on this gun, but I think of it as the automatic safety feature. I don't want any manual safeties on any defensive gun. Some people have had trouble with it jamming, but I polished the feed ramp on mine to a mirror finish and it is 100 percent reliable with Remington Golden Sabre 124gr.

Some people will dish Kel-Tecs, but I feel this particular model is a good gun, but could sometimes use a little tuning. The KTOG forum is a great place for support, and Kel-Tec is well known for great warranty service.

For a long time it used to be smallest and lightest 9mm made, but now others have copied it, and perhaps done a slightly better job. I have not shot any of the new crop of very small 9mm's.

I think of this gun as a mini-Glock. It is very similar. Glock does not make a gun this light and small.
 
It varies, of course.

Idek said:
I suspect most people shoot more accurately with guns that have a little heft, longer barrels, and hand-filling grips. And therefore, they probably shoot worse with tiny pocket guns. I'm interested in guns that provide a good compromise between "shootability" and portability.

Which smaller sized handguns perform best for you at the range?
Idek, I'm passing certain you are correct. I shot both NRA Bullseye and PPC competition for a number of years. While I was never a threat to those who were champions, I did watch them and see their guns. None of them shot tiny gripped guns with ultra short barrels. Not a blessed one. Of course, large grips and long barrels don't contribute to a concealed self-defense gun. But then, self-defense guns have a different requisite level of accuracy.

I collect .32 ACP pistols of the 'Art Deco' period. I shoot them a bit just to see how they work and determine their accuracy levels - at least in my hands.

Just because I fell into it, I also have a Beretta 418 (I think, the model numbers are somewhat vague at times) in .25 ACP and made for vest pocket carry. The Beretta 418 has a 'two finger' grip. My middle and ring finger fit the grip, that's all. (See attached photo.) In spite of that, if I have good light and can find the sights, I can put all the shots on a regular piece of typing paper at 7 yards. (Two handed, slow fire; testing the gun itself.) (See attached photo.)

The pride of my .32 collection is a nicely preserved 1935 Beretta. With the 'pinky spur' on the magazine, I can get all of my short pudgy fingers on the grip. (See attached photo.) This is another pistol limited by the small, fixed sights (more limited by the 'small' than the 'fixed') and a 'Michael Moore' trigger (too heavy and much creep), but at twenty-five yards will hold shots in the head of an NRA B27 target.

I also have several short barreled revolvers. One in particular is a Smith & Wesson five screw, Military & Police (later Model 10) in 2 inch barrel form. It has a full grip, but only a 'snubby' barrel. With standard .38 Special ammo (158 grain RNL bullet at 750-800 f/s) it will stay on a B27 target at 50 yards as long as I pay attention.

In short, 'small' guns will shoot about as well as the shooter will allow. However, I must confess I feel much more comfortable with a full sized belt gun. They are easier to control, especially in a hurry.
 

Attachments

  • Beretta 418 two finger grip.JPG
    Beretta 418 two finger grip.JPG
    160.7 KB · Views: 29
  • Beretta 418 7 yd shot group deliberate.jpg
    Beretta 418 7 yd shot group deliberate.jpg
    225.3 KB · Views: 25
  • Beretta 1935 three finger grip.JPG
    Beretta 1935 three finger grip.JPG
    163.4 KB · Views: 27
The smallest handgun I target shoot with is a Glock 27. If a person was stupid enough to stand still and let me shoot at them, I'd hit them 25 yards away.

The smallest handgun I've shot is a KelTec P3AT which is a .380 pocket pistol. It worked just fine at five yards. i didn't try to get any further away than that. It didn't seem to be intended for use much beyond that.
 
I shoot my sig p238 pretty well. Im not saying ill ever do competitive shooting with it but I can hit the target at any realistic pistol range.
 
Beretta Tomcat 3032 in 7.65 mm Browning.

In Single-Action mode, it is ~4 lbs. A little stacking but not bad.

For such a small pistol, I can keep it on target easily. I love 'cocked and locked', even on the mouse pistols.
 
Please define shoot well for me LOL. If we are talking about center mass hits at 3 to 5 yards then just about anything will get the job done but if we are talking consistent center mass hits at 15 yards that is a whole different ball game.

For me the CW9 is a great balance. I do not pocket carry so I do not need the smaller CM9/PM9. I can get a full grip on the CW9 and it completely disappears in a IWB holster under a T-Shirt and I do not notice the weight at all.

I can get consistent groups of under 3" at 15 yards so for me it meets all of my needs for a carry gun role. I know that I can draw and fire with enough accuracy to score meaningful hits at self defense ranges which is the guns intended purpose.

That said it does not compare to the accuracy of my Govt 1911 or BHP.
 
My first handgun was a "4 Aces" derringer, then a "Little Ace," then I moved up to a lightweight Browning .25. I guess I learned the hard way, but I was able to shoot them accurately enough to be very confident in carrying them. Some years later I got a .22 short NAA mini revolver and carried it for many years. One of the most accurate guns I ever owned was a Beretta Minx M4 (the longer 3-1/2" bbl. version.) I used to hustle people with their brand new custom-built, bull bbl. target .38s. I would challenge them to a match, shooting at a cardboard 50 rd. .22lr box hung from the target carrier at 25 yards. The most hits out of 5 won. I made a lot of people very mad.
I have collected and shot pocket guns for a long time. One thing I learned was most of them are very accurate, but hard for most people to shoot.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top