Got on offer for a S&W model 19-3 2.5" 357 mag 85% quality it's going for $750.00 any thoughts on this baby??
$750 is high, but old S&Ws are going for crazy money these days, and the 2.5" barrel 19 is a rare variant, which adds further to the price. And, its not like they are making new ones...
To me, it isn't a matter of "if" but "when" that forcing cone will break.
To me, its a matter of "shoot the right ammo and you won't have any trouble". Forcing cone issues in the model 19 are well documented, and even if the gun has been abused by large amounts of 125gr JHP, cracks, chips, and wear are easy to spot with careful inspection.
Model 19s were in service for a long time, with no abnormal issues when 158gr .357 was the standard ammo. Problems didn't show up until police depts. began firing large amounts of 125gr JHPs in training.
Personally, I'm not a fan of short barrels on medium or large frame guns. Nor am I a fan of tiny .357 mags. For concealment, the bulk of a revolver is in the cylinder and grips. An additional inch or inch and a half of barrel is a minor matter, comparatively speaking, but does yield a significant improvement in velocity with some loads.
My personal snubnose is a Colt Agent .38 Spl. It is a tiny bit larger than the smallest S&Ws but it holds 6, not 5. I also think that the blast and recoil of the .357 in a snubnose is not worth the slight added velocity and energy the magnum gives, in the short barrel.
.38 special in a snubnose is a bit of a blast. .357 Magnum in the same gun is a small stick of dynamite. No problem with that first shot, but maybe following shots might be more problematical.
As to Rossi, Taurus, etc., Some of them seem ok, some are not as good, and it seems to be a flip of the coin, if you get one that works right, or not.
Also there is the point, for me, about spending what little money I have on US products, when possible, and very firm about that when practical.