sw_florida
Moderator
I hope the SC will rule as favorably as possibly can be: Guns for the people!
What I don't understand is how so many people think the 2nd amendment is pertaining to the first, the first postulating that a militia must be strong and independent, or what ever the 1st postulates. After all, what is a militia if the right to carry arms is not included and granted? That wouldn't be a militia; that would be just a group of independent people. If the judges can't understand that the 2nd is independent form the 1st, then the rest is all supporting the 1st, in a bizzare way.
Am I right or am I right?
What I don't understand is how so many people think the 2nd amendment is pertaining to the first, the first postulating that a militia must be strong and independent, or what ever the 1st postulates. After all, what is a militia if the right to carry arms is not included and granted? That wouldn't be a militia; that would be just a group of independent people. If the judges can't understand that the 2nd is independent form the 1st, then the rest is all supporting the 1st, in a bizzare way.
Am I right or am I right?