What went wrong?

The AP reported today that the killer acted on opportunity. Another dirtball that should never have been walking the streets.


Posted on Sat, Oct. 6, 2007


Police: Suspect followed armored car to ATM before killing guards

MARYCLAIRE DALE

The Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA - A convicted bank robber charged with killing two armored car guards had spotted the vehicle on the road and followed it to the ATM where he opened fire, a homicide detective said Saturday.

Mustafa Ali, 36, of Philadelphia, executed the two retired Philadelphia police officers without a word, police said.

"He follows the truck, he sees an opportunity and he takes it," said the detective, who worked on the case but requested anonymity because he is not authorized to comment publicly.

Ali owned the dark Acura used in the heist, although the FBI had not been able to glean the license plate number from the surveillance film, the detective said. Ali instead became a suspect based on tips called in from the public.

Commissioner Sylvester Johnson, whose department has struggled to solve murder cases amid a 'stop snitching' culture, thanked the community for stepping up in this case.

"Within an hour, we started getting information from citizens," Johnson said at a Saturday afternoon news conference. "(Ali) will never walk the streets, hopefully, again in his lifetime."

Johnson declined to discuss details of the case or the suspect's background and police did not release his arrest photo.

Ali, who is married and employed, previously served seven years in federal prison for armed bank robbery under the name Shawn Steele, according to federal court records and law enforcement officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case.

A 1993 indictment charged three men, including the 21-year-old Steele, with stealing a combined $25,000 in eight Philadelphia bank robberies in 1992. His supervised release ended in 2004.

Ali was arraigned shortly after 9 p.m. Saturday and was held without bail. He was represented by a public defender, and a preliminary hearing was set for Oct. 10. He was arrested on an unrelated warrant Friday and later charged with two counts of murder, robbery, a firearms charge and other crimes after giving a statement.

Police recovered the gun, a 9 mm semiautomatic, near a northeast Philadelphia community college after Ali told them where he had tossed it, the detective said.

The victims, William Widmaier, 65, and Joseph Alullo, 54, were friends from their days working together on the police force. They had both gone to work for Loomis, the armored-car company, after they retired , Widmaier in 1989 and Alullo in 2000.

Loomis does not require its guards to wear bulletproof vests, although the company said it would now review that policy. The slain men did not have them on.

The robber approached the armored car from behind Thursday morning outside a bank at a northeast Philadelphia mall. Surveillance tapes from the Wachovia bank security camera and another nearby business show the robber getting out of his car and putting on gloves before firing.

The gunman shot Widmaier once in the chest and Alullo three times in the chest and abdomen, police said. He then fired at a third guard driving the vehicle, who was grazed by the shattered window.

The gunman left with a bag of deposits , likely a mix of cash and checks , but police do not think there was much money in it.

Tipsters who reported information about an Acura and driver matching the surveillance images led police to an apartment complex Friday afternoon, where authorities said they found Ali preparing to leave the area.

"We want to bring peace to the streets of the city," said Jody Weis, the FBI's supervisory agent in Philadelphia. "That cannot happen without the cooperation of the citizens."

Widmaier, married with adult children, was the union shop steward for the Pennsauken, N.J., based division of Loomis, where both men worked. Alullo was married with three daughters.
 
Ah, that tiny weak European caliber. Again. For having no stopping power it sure pops up in these kinds of stories a lot.

Snark aside, moral of the story is - wear body armor. Some body armor is better than none. More body armor is better than less.

I managed to snag a very good condition Safariland IIIA vest with trauma place for about $150 on eBay.

Please, if you're in this sort of business... buy yourself a vest. Even if the company officially says no, wear a concealable one under your uniform if they have no way of finding out, or find another job. Few sacrifices in this world are worth your life.
 
"Ah, that tiny weak European caliber. Again. For having no stopping power it sure pops up in these kinds of stories a lot."

There is a big differance between executing someone and having 'stopping power'.
A .22 RF to the head will kill you, and if the first one fails to enter you just fire another.
 
Please, if you're in this sort of business... buy yourself a vest. Even if the company officially says no, wear a concealable one under your uniform if they have no way of finding out, or find another job. Few sacrifices in this world are worth your life.

Absolutely. I even suggest security guards in "low threat" jobs wear at least a knife-resistant vest. A vest that defeats 9mm should at least be worn in areas where there's a risk of being shot. If you earn enough to fill out a 1040 (long) form, even if the company won't pay for it, you can deduct it as "safety equipment" for your job. If you need to, negotiate with the office to buy the vest and allow you to pay it off through payroll deductions.

If a company official says they won't allow security personnel to wear a vest on duty, find another job and then have your state's AG office investigate them. There's no reason an armored car company shouldn't at least subsidize your purchase of a vest.
 
Vests

our company strongly suggests we wear a vest so where did you come to the conclusion the company did not allow vests to be worn. As to your thoughts Eric, as I stated in earlier posts I do this for a living daily. I wear a vest carry a 9mm with two extra mags for a total of 30rds. Someone dropped the ball. The driver,the service techs, both. Would you find it strange if someone were wearing a trench coat in summer? We are constantly being told and through training to LOOK for the unusual. Puting on gloves should have raised some concern. In the photos the truck is parked close to the ATM machine so my question AGAIN is how did the driver let this person get close enough to do what he did. WE ARE TOLD DO NOT LET ANYONE get within striking distance. I do believe they let him get to close. I hope to have more inside info from with in the company to share with all on the board. I also hope the company make some changes from this event. And yes IF BOTH techs were wearing vest they would be alive. Both were shot in the chest.
 
There's no perfect result in any scenario like this, I suppose, but somehow I just can't wrap my head around the situation not having a possibly better result. Training? Preparedness? There's almost always more that can be done there. It certainly seems like the bad guy had prepared a lot more than they had.
 
That wasnt an assassination. Chest shots arent assassinations with a "Defensive" caliber. It was a robbery in which the guy wanted to follow in the footsteps of so many old school criminals who simply wasted the cops, no matter the situation.

An assassination would have been walk up, one in the head, the other in the face. Still, the fact that the perp walked 700 feet seems off to me. The "guard" partner couldn't have been scanning the area for threats. While I admit it may be difficult to identify a threat in a crowd of people, its not as difficult to identify a pistol being drawn/held and that particular person heading directly for you.

...It also rubs me the wrong way that "he didnt get away with much money." What, if he got five million dollars it would have been better? :mad:
 
You have to remember that there are blind spots for the driver and he can't always pay attention to someone 100, 200 or more feet away when others are closer.

It is difficult to maintain 100% alertness and scope out every person as a potential threat every single day. Especially when things are deemed "low risk" -- such as loading an ATM in an area with video surveillance and where there are many witnesses.

Chalk this one up to bad Karma... the driver missed the approaching perp (was he scoping out the hot babe leaving the store?), the watching guard was distracted by the argument he had with his wife last night, the guy loading the ATM missed his 2nd cup of coffee that morning... whatever.
 
Curiosity has the best of me

BillCA, how or where or who informed you the ATM service is DEEMED LOW RISK? Have you done or are doing this for a living? ATM service puts us at the most risk for the following reason, this is where we spend more time being exposed to the dangers that lurk. In and out of customer locations is much faster in comparison to servicing ATM'S and your focus is on your surrondings and not pulling double duty. I.m not looking for a flame war and we all are entitled to our opinions on this matter. I personaly feel there is NO ASPECT OF A ARMED SERVICE TECHNICIAN'S DAILY DUTY THAT IS LOW RISK! 30 stops today puts me at risk 60 times for a possible hold up, shot at, whatever the case. Sorry but I do not see any of this as LOW RISK.:cool:
 
:confused: It's NOT the real world. It's NOT Pennsylvania. It's Philadelphia!

Ain't nothing low risk about that entire socialist Hell-hole of a city! It runs on welfare. The jails have revolving doors; up to half the city's permanent residents are on either probation or parole, and between prison sentences.

The only honest definition for the occupation of any money courier working in that city would have to be high risk - very high risk!

(I know I wouldn't do it.) :eek:
 
Back
Top