I'm not attempting to point out any one person's post had a stunningly stupid question in it - I agree the worst question is the one that isn't asked.
And I certainly don't propose making people feel like they just asked the dumbest question in the world. But as said, if the info given seems to lack enough background - to the point someone's safety is involved - hiding behind the excuse someone's feelings might get hurt won't cut it if there is real personal injury. Firearms are not like a quiet game of checkers at the city park.
I do appreciate both sides of this discussion and the way it's being handled. I did overemphasize the point "What range, what target?" for a reason - too many shooters these days aren't making it the point at all, they simply want to buy a token of manhood to show they have arrived. Guns are a lot more than that, not something you get at the mall because the senior class wears it, or because someone handed you a diploma ( for example.)
We designed, buy, and use a tool for a purpose. A firearm has a purpose, beyond the social strategizing American society seems to engage in 24/7 these days. The purpose of a firearm is to launch a bullet FIRST, everything it is and does is subordinate to that.
The BULLET is the primary object - just like the nail has priority over the hammer. Walk into a hardware store and you get plenty of selection of both, but what is all the merchandising about? Hammers - and sometimes we obsess too much about them, not the nail. If anything, the darn nails get ignored - and what the nails are supposed to actually DO gets the least amount of coverage.
Check around, actual use is given short shrift - a token forum on application, the rest of the dozens listed are all about the hammers, with subcategories on framing, general, carpentry, sledge, metalwork, auto body, and combo survival units. One forum on nailing, and then back to subcatgories of carry, holsters, bags, boxes, associated tools, and don't forget past and future models, plus a forum on experimental modifications,and last but not least, making your own hammer.
Contrast asking "What range, what target?" with asking "What joint, what wood?" Carpenters aren't likely to be dismissive about it. They recognize the essence of the job is to correctly fasten a joint together of dissimilar pieces so that it retains it's integrity over a long period of time. Failure is not an option.
Ask "What range, what target?" on a gun forum, and we get "Sure they're dumb, don't hurt their feelings?" Is that a responsible way to pinpoint a problem area?
If the shooter doesn't know the range, and hasn't a clue about the target, it should be the point. They aren't shooting, they are collecting firearms to admire or whatever. It's a free country, they certainly can do that, but putting it in the context of "What's the absolute Best Brand to buy in a SHTF gun." without considering range and target becomes a directionless discussion of "What's the latest Hype that impresses the under 25 demographic in the gun market?"
In terms of self awareness and ability to control their surroundings, it's been suggested that we are the Tier One Being on the face of earth because we are tool users. Therefore, if it's a discussion about anything, it's about use, and that means "What range, what target?"
Ignore that and it becomes a quagmire of fashion and politics - and we have the AWB as a great example of that on one hand, and the closely focused (myopic) concentration of how cool certain curios and relics are on the other - to the point of declaring an obsolete 50+ year old design as the ultimate, bar none.
There are plenty of those posts already.
The name of this forum is "The Firing Line," and if you were standing on one right now with gun in hand, what would the focus of your attention be? Whether other shooters were savvy enough to be congnizant the anodizing matched on the upper and lower of your $1900 gun? Or, "What range, what target?" And what about the guy in the next lane over?